Chris Langham

@dead_on_arrvial wrote:

I am not sure how you would find a child p or n site on the web, I know a lot of broadband companies ban them and do not allow access to them.

May be Pb can have a go at finding one later and report back on the results.

But I don’t think downloading 1 file of a 8-year-old girl makes someone a paedophile, only curious.

After all the talk about it, a lot of people are curious about the subject, (mostly those who where abused in the past.)

Has far has 40 year old men “smiling seductively” at 12 year old girls, you have never been to London fashion week.

All jokes a side, DOA your comments are just wrong, and rather worrying.
How the hell can you be curious about an 8yr old? your comments are bang out of order you sick puppy!

@dead_on_arrvial wrote:

I am not sure how you would find a child p or n site on the web, I know a lot of broadband companies ban them and do not allow access to them.

May be Pb can have a go at finding one later and report back on the results.

But I don’t think downloading 1 file of a 8-year-old girl makes someone a paedophile, only curious.

After all the talk about it, a lot of people are curious about the subject, (mostly those who where abused in the past.)

Has far has 40 year old men “smiling seductively” at 12 year old girls, you have never been to London fashion week.

doa the man had 15 such videos/pictures so i think we can safely say he was a little more than “curious.” Why anyone would feel the need to see for themselves what someone else has described as horrific child abuse, is mind boggling, and to pass it off as curiousity is a pathetic excuse. In fact anyone who seeks this kind of vile material, whether it be 1 picture or however many more, must have some paedophile tendancies to want to see it in the first place.

@dead_on_arrvial wrote:

No Anita I am just being reasonable and realistic.

There been so much public hysteria about this subject, there has been a witch-hunt going on for many years now, I think its time we all asked ourselves;

What is a paedophile?

Personally I don’t think Chris langham meets my criteria for being one.

I don’t think he’s a danger to children but if he’s only curious about the subject, locking him up with hard-core paedophiles is the worst thing to do.

I can only but hope your joking! I personally do not consider it normal, let alone reasonable to be curious in any shape or form of an 8yr old!
If Langham does not meet the criteria of being a paedo, i dont know what does :roll:

It often gets passed off as ‘curiousity’ but anyone who tries to justify it that way, in fact any way, is no better. I read in Joan Burnie (think it was her page) someone had wrote in and said something along the lines of ‘I visited these pages as I know they are vile and I think everyone should know just how sick it is’ The general feeling was that this person was seriously trying to portray themselves as a sacraficial lamb in some moral crusade and must have been expecting a pat on the back for their efforts.

A bit like Langham who would have you believe he was doing it to make a statement.

Dress it up however you want, it all points to the same thing.

@dead_on_arrvial wrote:

Ok in simple terms for you.

Someone goes in tescos and steels a tin of beans, are they going to become bank robbers?

Do you think someone who steals a tin of beans should get the same punishment; has someone who goes into a bank with gun?

There a big different between someone who “views” child p o r n and those who make it. There a big different between someone who rapes a child, then kills them.

But reading your posts, it seems anyone who views or has BAD thoughts about children should be lock up for good.

The world is grey, not black and white.

Some people are beyond help :roll: