-
Posts
-
@james Belfast wrote:
you must be scraping the bottom of several barrels if you try to dress this one up as child abuse.
Where does it say i said that???
Your craftily-worded heading says it all about you – you are evil and arrogant.
You must have a mirror next to your screen :wink:
Never mind trying to pretend to argue over the word ‘may’, why on earth would it be PHYSICAL AND MENTAL CHILD ABUSE to encourage white children to play together with black children from as early an age as possible?
Because if you read it all carefully, those marxists say “should” play together. Ipso facto, if they dont, then must be forced, that will include physical abuse if the child throws a wobbly, like alot of 3 year olds do.
Were your children not aware of what is ‘good’ and ‘bad’ (e.g. touching the fire is bad, reading is good) by the age of 3? Who taught them that – the parents. Did they know why reading is good or clever or why the fire is bad at that age – probably not but they knew not to touch the fire cos mummy and daddy said so. Their views were fixed by that age.
No one told me that it is bad not to want to play with another child because he or she was a different colour. I was given the choice.
Can you not therefore get it through your thick fecking head that the professor could be (probably is) right when he says that the children’s views on skin colour can already be fixed by the age of 3
EVERYTHING “could” be this that or the other.
I say, lets deal with facts when it comes to 3 year old children, not turn them into scientific experiments because of a failed multicultural experiment that went wrong.
some nurseries may well need to insist that the children play together
Need i go on…
Most right-thinking (i.e. sane) parents would be APPALLED if their kids were kept apart from other kids at school because of skin colour.
WHO is doing that???
PLEASE GIVE EMMA HER OWN THREAD COS I AM SICK OF HAVING TO READ THIS SHYTE FROM HER
You dont make much sense anyway.
@james Belfast wrote:
erm..in your heading you dozy cow.
:oops: Wrote the wrong thing there :D Tis child abuse though, so not scraping the barrel, just stating fact.
How about replying to the other points i made, or have you lost the argument and now see sense?
@emmalush wrote:
@james Belfast wrote:
Never mind trying to pretend to argue over the word ‘may’, why on earth would it be PHYSICAL AND MENTAL CHILD ABUSE to encourage white children to play together with black children from as early an age as possible?
Because if you read it all carefully, those marxists say “should” play together. Ipso facto, if they dont, then must be forced, that will include physical abuse if the child throws a wobbly, like alot of 3 year olds do.
So there we finally have it- there is no law, there is no compulsion- just Emma’s perverse opinion that if children don’t play together they’ll be “forced” to and using a thread to call it child abuse- of course Emma, toe the BNP line- baaa baaa
I take it you have no children then Emma. Children are “forced” to go to school every day, are “forced” to take PE, History, Maths etc- things they don’t want to do-
@slayer wrote:
So there we finally have it- there is no law, there is no compulsion
Guidlines to do what slayer, you still havnt asnswered that yet, cos you know full well it means guidlines to force.
Children are “forced” to go to school every day, are “forced” to take PE, History, Maths etc- things they don’t want to do
What 3 year olds learn that. Deary me.
@emmalush wrote:
Squeezy, if a child under these propossed laws refuses to play with another child, what do you think the teacher will do next?
There is nothing that they can do.
But how many 3 year olds do you know who won’t play with someone because of their race or colour??? :?
I don’t know any
I learnt a new internet term recently, the word is “troll”. It applies to someone who plays the fool online in order to gain attention. So it’s safe to say that Emma is a troll (one that needs to go back under her bridge).
@emmalush wrote:
@slayer wrote:
So there we finally have it- there is no law, there is no compulsion
Guidlines to do what slayer, you still havnt asnswered that yet, cos you know full well it means guidlines to force.
Children are “forced” to go to school every day, are “forced” to take PE, History, Maths etc- things they don’t want to do
What 3 year olds learn that. Deary me.
Guidelines do not mean force- you have no ounce of understanding of our education system, do you. Guidelines means what should happen, what is recommended to happen, what is best practise- it is legally impossible for it to mean PHYSICAL FORCE- you cannot PHYSICALLY FORCE a child to do anything against its wishes- IT IS ILLEGAL- GOT IT
@emmalush wrote:
@james Belfast wrote:
erm..in your heading you dozy cow.
:oops: Wrote the wrong thing there :D Tis child abuse though, so not scraping the barrel, just stating fact.
How about replying to the other points i made, or have you lost the argument and now see sense?
Ok, well you also wrote the wrong thing in the last paragraph of your original post too – clumsy!
I am not replying to the rest cos I am not going to go back over the same old ground over and over again. I would just take issue over one new revelation tho. You said:
No one told me that it is bad not to want to play with another child because he or she was a different colour. I was given the choice.
Maybe that explains why you have grown up thinking the way you do, who knows?
Ok I am outta this thread now.
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!