-
Posts
-
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
1 John tyndall founded the BNP so of course a picture of him in nazi uniform is relevant to whether the BNP is a neo-nazi party.
So to use your childish logic of thought, all germans are still nazis, because they once were :roll:
2 Holocaust denial is something that relates predominantly to the extermination of 6 million Jews during WWII.
No it doesnt, thats what you’ve been brainwashed into believing by liberal fascists, because they hate hitler and those who they feel think along his ideological standing.
Get ya head out your arce, and start thinking for yourself!! You cant possibly know what you just said.Do you even accept that 6 million Jews were exterminated in concentration camps?
I would rather believe that than the oppositte thought.
3 David Copeland was a terrorist who had bnp membership.
Had, not has.
Tony Lecomber is a convicted terrorist who still has bnp membership.
You have proof of this right?
What about tony blair and jack straw, there terrorists and have labour membership, and are funded by English tax payers.
Atleast dik turpin wore a mask :P
@emmalush wrote:
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
1 John tyndall founded the BNP so of course a picture of him in nazi uniform is relevant to whether the BNP is a neo-nazi party.
So to use your childish logic of thought, all germans are still nazis, because they once were :roll:
2 Holocaust denial is something that relates predominantly to the extermination of 6 million Jews during WWII.
No it doesnt, thats what you’ve been brainwashed into believing by liberal fascists, because they hate hitler and those who they feel think along his ideological standing.
Get ya head out your arce, and start thinking for yourself!! You cant possibly know what you just said.Do you even accept that 6 million Jews were exterminated in concentration camps?
I would rather believe that than the oppositte thought.
3 David Copeland was a terrorist who had bnp membership.
Had, not has.
Tony Lecomber is a convicted terrorist who still has bnp membership.
You have proof of this right?
What about tony blair and jack straw, there terrorists and have labour membership, and are funded by English tax payers.
Atleast dik turpin wore a mask :P
1 All Germans were members of the nazi party??? No they weren’t you dopey cow :roll:
2 Hating Hitler is a bad thing now?
3 Tony Lecomber was convicted for conspiracy to cause explosions. He even had explosives on his person when he was arrested.
4 Jack Straw’s a terrorist?? WTF?
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
1 All Germans were members of the nazi party???
Ok, some or most, that better for you.
2 Hating Hitler is a bad thing now?
Hating anyone is fascism, but atleast we can do that about some people, even those we talk to.
4 Jack Straw’s a terrorist?? WTF?
He believe’s in terrorising innocent millions in iraq.
He contradicts himself alot, calling bin laden and such like the same as what he is himself.
[/quote]Er….. Emma I don’t rreally think that you can fairly accuse Her Majesty’s Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs of being a ‘terrorist’.
Granted he may be a lot of things – but surely not a terrorist.
True he did have a pretty murky past including being a student radical in (I think) the 1960’s. How about you explore that bit of his history. I am sure that there is a lot of dirt to be dug up if you are up for it???
@emmalush wrote:
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
1 All Germans were members of the nazi party???
Ok, some or most, that better for you.
2 Hating Hitler is a bad thing now?
Hating anyone is fascism, but atleast we can do that about some people, even those we talk to.
4 Jack Straw’s a terrorist?? WTF?
He believe’s in terrorising innocent millions in iraq.
He contradicts himself alot, calling bin laden and such like the same as what he is himself.[/quote]
PMSL- even to a direct question relating to Hitler, you can’t give a straight answer
@forumhostpb wrote:
Er….. Emma I don’t rreally think that you can fairly accuse Her Majesty’s Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs of being a ‘terrorist’.
Granted he may be a lot of things – but surely not a terrorist.
http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/terrorist?view=uk
“terrorist • noun a person who uses violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims”Of course i can, hes used violence in iraq, and intimidation both here and iraq for political aim.
Its so easy to believe the same media spew that only those our government call terrorists, are terrorists because there apparently “on our side”.
Ah….. I see what you mean now Emma.
So basically you are saying that ANYBODY who ‘uses violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims’ is a terrorist.
Oh dear oh dear Emma, I cannot help thinking that you may have opened a can of worms here. Still, we shall see what the anti-BNP members make of this post eh???
@forumhostpb wrote:
Ah….. I see what you mean now Emma.
So basically you are saying that ANYBODY who ‘uses violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims’ is a terrorist.
Oh dear oh dear Emma, I cannot help thinking that you may have opened a can of worms here. Still, we shall see what the anti-BNP members make of this post eh???
Either or PB. Of course the anti bnp/pro liberal alliance will have us believe that liberalism means everything but a stamp on their heads describing such a phrase.
But as time progresses, and everyday people like me start to ask questions of the ever increasing political slant, then that lefty political slant starts to wonder where their core base ideology went.
The future of political success, isnt short term quick fix/long term instability. The future success of political ideology is based on strong core policy on which you build a strong foundation for the future.
Liberalism doesnt allow for that, and what you then get, is what you see now at the labour party, disaster.
For twenty seven years, “we” have voted for short term quick fix/long term instability, i just hope that people wont keep doing so.
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!