Brand and Ross

@minim wrote:

Slayer what the hell does it matter what she has done or what her band is called? She can be outraged by what Russell Brand said on an answerphone to her grandfather if she pleases. In my opinion she doesn’t need to justify her indignation.

What I am trying to say is, that if the situation was at all comical or humerous he would probably have got away with it. She would eventually have laughed it off, and it would all have been forgotten. But it wasn’t and she didn’t but it will anyway.

So its not important that she is in a “band” which appears to have several crass conotations to Nazi style imagery when her grandfather, who she is so concerned about when he discovered she’d sha/gged Brand, was an escapee from the Nazi Holocaust?

She can be as indignant as she likes but it’s a bit like me having an affair and then being indignant when I find out my wife has had one!!!!

Pot….Kettle….Black

@minim wrote:

Your logic is flawed, because the name of her band has no relevance to the level of her indignation, and nor does her grandfather’s background. The whole incident is purely about how crass and tasteless Russel Brand was, phoning Andrew Sachs and leaving obscene messages on his answerphone.

Minim

It is not the name of the band- it the whole website (have a click, go on).

I have not denied that the original stunt wasnt that funny and wasnt in great taste. What is undeniable is her indignation is based on her grandfathers reaction. However she appears to have no issues with being involved in an organisation/band which has, amongst its website, what appears to be crass Nazi imagery and not care what her grandfather thinks- so why the indignation then?

@slayer wrote:

@pete wrote:

Her band name makes not one jot of difference unless you think it would have been different if they’d been called Angelic Angels. Shagging someone doesn’t give you bragging rights

Her incredible indignation at the incident which could have affected her relationship with her grandfather “for life” (from her press statement) does not go so far as to think her grandfather may be affected by his grandaughter being in a band called the Satanic Sluts. Forgive me but the term “satanic” is normally associated with the devil, evil etc and the term “sluts” normally applies to sexually promiscuous.

Perhaps the link to the website will help

http://www.satanic-sluts.com/

And she’s worried about what her grandfather will think about her sha/gging Russell Brand ffs!!

Actually sh/agging someone gives you lots of rights- the right to the fact you’ve shared bodily fluids and the right to the fact that it happened. The fact he bragged about it may be indelicate or insensitive but it is also a truth not a lie.

Angelic Angels would have got less hits eh and publicity is what it’s all about. If someone wears a t shirt saying i’m a slut can i go up and grope her ? cause she’s announcing she doesnt much care apprently Sharing any fluids does not give you broadcast rights whether thats over the radio or to your mates at work. The hurt is to her Grandfather it was his phone the messages were left on how she “dresses” is irrelevant

That was Brand who said that.
Mr Sach and his grand daughter didn’t say anything about all this or seemed remotely bothered until the Sunday Mail decided to phone them up and stir it to get a story.
Also i’m sorry but you cant belong to a Nazi Satanic Sluts band with half naked pics of birds with nothing on but tassles on their nips then start moaning about someone else has offended your Grand Father by stating you had sex with some bloke.
Double standards.

So it’s ok to offend her Grandfather ?