-
Posts
-
The next generation Russian stealth fighters,
Does evolution only apply to Russia? What about the next generation of NATO jets?
Its clear our top jets are better than the Russian, why should that dynamic suddenly change from a country with a smaller GDP than Italy? (Thanks Drac x)
Meanwhile in the real world no one is going to seriously mess with Russia militarily.
Our raids have done that. I suspect we haven’t finished yet
The “raids” that targeted 3 sites suspected of involvement with chemical weapons? Or the “five missiles” the UK fired at those sites? Try aiming those missiles at Russian bases and see what happens then.
Don’t prod the mighty Russian bear.
The next generation Russian stealth fighters,
Does evolution only apply to Russia? What about the next generation of NATO jets? Its clear our top jets are better than the Russian, why should that dynamic suddenly change from a country with a smaller GDP than Italy? (Thanks Drac x)
I am only playing both you and Draculina’s who has got the biggest willy game. Nothing more.
I have absolutely no idea where you assume India and China will side with the UK. Have you got a source for that?
It’s not about siding, it’s about Chain reaction, and Self preservation. China and India are close to Russia geographically. It might, in the Global picture be more effective for China or India to do the deed.
For example, let’s say Putin phones Theresa to tell her he’s going to nuke France. A great big bomb from Russia landing in France would affect London. In an absurd way, it would be better for UK to do the deed instead with small quicker bombs from south England, maybe preserving their own capital city if done surgically and close.
Of course this example is unrealistic and absurd, in today’s climate, but it’s an example of Chain reaction.
You talk about Russia like it is the Iraqi regime, or the Libyan regime, to be taken at will as and when the UK and our allies feel like it. If you poke the Russian ‘bear’ don’t be surprised when it turns round and bites you.
No one is doubting Russia’s status as a heavyweight. It seems it’s not the champion heavyweight, and it’s certainly not the only heavyweight. We expect all heavyweights to pack a punch.
-
This reply was modified 6 years, 9 months ago by
Morgan..
I have absolutely no idea where you assume India and China will side with the UK. Have you got a source for that?
It’s not about siding, it’s about Chain reaction, and Self preservation. China and India are close to Russia geographically. It might, in the Global picture be more effective for China or India to do the deed. For example, let’s say Putin phones Theresa to tell her he’s going to nuke France. A great big bomb from Russia landing in France would affect London. In an absurd way, it would be better for UK to do the deed instead with small quicker bombs from south England, maybe preserving their own capital city if done surgically and close. Of course this example is unrealistic and absurd, in today’s climate, but it’s an example of Chain reaction.
Oh dear. Russia is developing and may well already have stealth drone nukes, that travel thousands of miles on the sea bed invisibly to their target and you seriously think Putin is then going to phone up Theresa to reveal those “invisible” nukes.
Bless.
-
This reply was modified 6 years, 9 months ago by Ge.
You talk about Russia like it is the Iraqi regime, or the Libyan regime, to be taken at will as and when the UK and our allies feel like it. If you poke the Russian ‘bear’ don’t be surprised when it turns round and bites you.
No one is doubting Russia’s status as a heavyweight. It seems it’s not the champion heavyweight, and it’s certainly not the only heavyweight. We expect all heavyweights to pack a punch.
Absolutely it isn’t the only heavyweight and when people type about Russia like it is a third world nation, a lightweight, they best remember that.
with America bombed into the ice age China would become the number 1 global superpower
No it wouldn’t. If we lived in a world with no America, there would also be no China either.
No it doesn’t and with America bombed into the ice age China would become the number 1 global superpower. Similar to how America achieved that goal after two world wars.
To compare a Nuclear Holocaust of WW3, to WW1 &2 a century previous, is a little naive x
with America bombed into the ice age China would become the number 1 global superpower
No it wouldn’t. If we lived in a world with no America, there would also be no China either.
China is going to be the number 1 economic power shortly, no if or buts about it and China is not an extension of the USA armed forces, like the UK spittle lickers. There is absolutely no reason why China would take sides in a nuclear war already taking place and that does not involve her. It doesn’t make sense at all.
-
This reply was modified 6 years, 9 months ago by
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!