Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › BNP voters get new homes after 30 years of hurt
-
AuthorPosts
-
23 May, 2006 at 1:11 pm #4115
http://www.barking-dagenham.gov.uk/2-press-release/press-release-menu.cfm?item_code=2419
The BNP replied:
Group Leader of the official BNP opposition Cllr. Richard Barnbrook told the website, “We welcome this great news for local people, it is an historic decision by the Council and it just goes to show the BNP in power creates real changes for local people.”Whilst the indigenous people of this nation are usually ignored and their interests minimised and forgotten, the election of a BNP councillor ensures that our council taxes are used for our community and not just for asylum seekers or immigrants.
The BNP Group on the council treats all the residents of Barking and Dagenham equally regardless of race and religion, but members of the local indigenous white community have been racially discriminated against in the past by the council and it is our intention to prevent any such racial discrimination occurring again in the future.
A vote for the BNP is a vote for local people power.
People power in the form of democracy, will now ensure the local long suffering indigenous residents of Barking & Dagenham, will be considered for a better life, ahead of new labours sesspit multicultural disaster policy.
If this isnt happening for you, maybe you should consider more carefully who you vote for?
23 May, 2006 at 2:59 pm #220654The link is dead, probably because the council discovered the lies the BNP were telling about their housing policy. How an opposition party can take credit for a policy the ruling party implemented is beyond me. Talk about clutching at straws.
23 May, 2006 at 3:17 pm #220655@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
The link is dead, probably because the council discovered the lies the BNP were telling about their housing policy.
Very interesting. I wonder if the new labour fascists took it of. Its not in any of B&D’s press releases now, spooky.
Lies? 2 weeks after the BNP become the council opposition with a strong voice (that new labour fascists are trying desperately to ignore), when the overwhelming voter concern was housing issues for the long suffering indigenous population, comes the decision to admit defeat, and give these people what they deserve.
Had the people of B&D not voted against the oppression of fascist labour, this would never have happened, and its because the BNP gave those voters a voice, that this has come about, people power, long may it continue.
23 May, 2006 at 3:26 pm #220656Well since I haven’t read the article, I don’t really know what you’re talking about but I don’t know of any council that thinks up a new housing policy, implements it and reaps results all in the space of 14 days. I don’t know about your council but I know my council doesn’t get things done with lightning speed.
23 May, 2006 at 3:51 pm #220657Mr Big, if you were the council (new labour) in the weeks running up to the election, and you had this plan all but signed and sealed, ready to go, and masses of people were unhappy with housing, and set to vote for your main enemy, what would you do?
Explain to them the housing plan perhaps, so they wouldnt vote bnp.
Im willing to assume:
A, new labour didnt care about the voting public, and chose to ignore them.
B, they didnt understand the concern, enough that people would vote BNP.
C, now they have put through this plan, and how stupid they look, when they could’ve done it alone and took all the credit.Either way, we all know what a pathetic bunch of burocrats we have “working” for us up and down the country, and the sooner every day joe finds out what they get upto, the prawn cocktail sandwich brigade that is, the BETTER!!!
WE DESERVE BETTER PEOPLE!!
23 May, 2006 at 4:28 pm #220658Er…. what’s a ”prawn cocktail sandwich”???
23 May, 2006 at 7:50 pm #220659I couldn’t find the press release either which I assume means that it was factually incorrect and has been withdrawn. I did search through the other press releases tho (searchword: BNP) and found an interesting article about housing policy dated 25 April 2006. It is worth reading in it’s entirety to see just how the BNP seems to routinely lie and blow things out of proportion (link above) however, here are some extracts:
‘The number of asylum seekers housed by Barking and Dagenham Council is the lowest for five years.
In fact since 2000, the Council has not housed any new asylum seekers, unless they are children who arrive in Barking and Dagenham with no adult to look after them.
In response to questions from the media on this matter following Mr. Griffin’s comments on television, David Woods, Corporate Director of Customer Services has confirmed that only four Council properties are currently allocated to asylum seekers.
“Our properties are consistently being used to accommodate local people who are in need of social housing, including young families, key workers such as policemen and nurses, and older people. They are being housed through the Council’s new More Choice in Lettings Scheme. This scheme does not allocate any properties according to ethnicity. Accommodation is provided using the criteria, regardless of racial group, of people who live or work in the Borough or who have a strong local connection. The successful scheme has seen almost 1,000 people matched up with suitable properties since it launched in May 2005.”
Now, far be for me to use statistics (heheh) but this council has over 20,000 council properties and over 1000 leasehold flats. Only FOUR out of 21,000 are currently allocated to asylum seekers (which must be the lowest rate in the country) and the rest are allocated according to needs “regardless of racial group“.If anything, they should be taking in MORE (their fair share of) asylum seekers but, overall, it certainly seems fair to me – if they were not being fair wouldn’t the BNP challenege the council in the courts?
Most people only want fair treatment: That’s probably why the Labour council got re-elected and BNP didn’t get a sniff!
23 May, 2006 at 10:39 pm #220660@Lambrini Girl wrote:
I read that link Emma.
Are you trying to tell us that the poor down troden natives of Barking-Dagenham have been trying to get a housing estate built for 30 years with no avail but that eh presto, the BNP steps in and gets it sorted in 3 weeks?
I am sure even you can see the flaws in that reasoning.
Maybe floors is all they’ve got Lamby
Funny how the BNP website states the BNP “in power” in Barking- really, I thought the Labour party had control of the council- must have been a BNP mistake then
23 May, 2006 at 10:40 pm #220661@Lambrini Girl wrote:
I read that link Emma.
Are you trying to tell us that the poor down troden natives of Barking-Dagenham have been trying to get a housing estate built for 30 years with no avail but that eh presto, the BNP steps in and gets it sorted in 3 weeks?
I am sure even you can see the flaws in that reasoning.
Maybe floors is all they’ve got Lamby
Funny how the BNP website states the BNP “in power” in Barking- really, I thought the Labour party had control of the council- must have been a BNP mistake then
24 May, 2006 at 12:07 am #220662Sounds to me like the ruling Labour council has heeded the will of the electorate.
Isn’t that good governance? -
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!