Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › BNP – in the (bad) news yet again.
-
AuthorPosts
-
2 December, 2006 at 12:14 am #251911
Meanwhile back on Planet Reality…….
So Emma, leaving aside for just a moment your vast knowledge of Geo-politics. the topic of this thread was the disproportionate criminality of BNP Councillors.
This is NOT to say that there aren’t others from other political parties that commit similar criminal offences – there most definitely are – but the proportion of criminals, electoral fraudsters, debt evaders, and benefit cheats etc seem to be considerably higher in the BNP than in other parties.
From what I can discover, the so-called mainstream political parties get rid of these sorts of criminal undesirables just as quickly as they can. It would appear that the BNP retains them. Why Emma???
Don’t you think that they (the BNP) are doing their reputation a lot of harm by keeping these criminals as members???
2 December, 2006 at 11:32 am #251912@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
It will probably come as a surprise to the Malaysian government to find out that there was a coup there. I think you’ll find that the coup was in Thailand (same continent at least).
Are you THICK some of the time, or all of the time?
“This is NOT to say that there aren’t others from other political parties that commit similar criminal offences – there most definitely are – but the proportion of criminals, electoral fraudsters, debt evaders, and benefit cheats etc seem to be considerably higher in the BNP than in other parties.”
No, the fraudsters sent us into 2 illegal wars in which hundreds of thousands have been murdered, where 125 of our innocent troops have been killed/murdered, where thousands of our people have been seriously injured, and million of iraq’s have been seriously injured.
The proportionate of criminals belong to the old gang parties.
The prime minister, not a candidate, not a councilour, not just an MP, but the PRIME MINISTER who order the deaths of thousands of people, is STILL a member of the new labour party, not to mention the other ministers, the other MP’s etc etc etc etc.
You have lost this argument PB, admit it.
Do you think new labour do themselves any favours keeping these members in the party?
When are the millions of people who voted for the above, going to apologise to the rest of us for the murder of thousands???
2 December, 2006 at 12:28 pm #251913Emma dearest, it’s all very well banging on and on about Tony’s war in Iraq etc etc but I cannot see that this addresses my issue. The so-called morality of the war being waged in Iraq and elsewhere does not imply that the Prime Minister (or indeed any of the Government) have been convicted in the criminal courst or the civil courts – unlike several BNP Councillors.
The plain fact appears to be that the BNP seems to have a disproportionately high number of convicted criminals, electoral fraudsters, debt avoiders and so on amongst its members who are elected Councillors.
Unless the BNP cleans up its act by removing such people from its membership (or at least withdrawing support from them) then nobody is going to take it seriously as a viable altewrnative political party. Instead they will simply write off its policies as the mouthings of a few malcontents and trouble makers.
BTW did you know that under Section 106 of the Local Government Finance Act 1982, ANY local Councillor who is two or more months in arrears with their Council Tax payments may NOT vote on Council matters at any meetings.
Since it would appear from previous posts on the subject, a number of BNP Councillors have failed to pay even their rent, do you suppose that they will have paid their Council Tax???
After all if they haven’t, then they will hardly be able to fully carry out their duties and represent the people that voted for them.
2 December, 2006 at 6:02 pm #251914@forumhostpb wrote:
Emma dearest, it’s all very well banging on and on about Tony’s war in Iraq etc etc but I cannot see that this addresses my issue.
You are suggesting that the BNP are bad because 5-10 or so of them have commited a crime, so im saying to you, that hundreds of new labour and conservative MP’s, and maybe even other political supporters are ATLEAST bad for war crimes.
Which is worse, which is more bad? Put your argument into context…
The so-called morality of the war being waged in Iraq and elsewhere does not imply that the Prime Minister (or indeed any of the Government) have been convicted in the criminal courst or the civil courts
Technicly not convicted, because the convictors in our society are those who should be convicted, you work it out…
Unless the BNP cleans up its act by removing such people from its membership (or at least withdrawing support from them) then nobody is going to take it seriously as a viable altewrnative political party.
The BNP’s criminal acts, are miniscule in comparison with the people who run our country and society. WELL DONE for exposing the gold fish, now go after the sharks?
Instead they will simply write off its policies as the mouthings of a few malcontents and trouble makers.
So you think their policies are good, just written by bad people?
Since it would appear from previous posts on the subject, a number of BNP Councillors have failed to pay even their rent, do you suppose that they will have paid their Council Tax???
Why couldn’t they pay their rent and/or council tax?
After all if they haven’t, then they will hardly be able to fully carry out their duties and represent the people that voted for them.
Who’s fault is that?
2 December, 2006 at 6:33 pm #251915@jelly tot wrote:
@emmalush wrote:
The order to murder hundreds of thousands of innocent people in a foreign country, an illegal war, at the risk of our boys and girls lives, of which one hundred and twenty five have lost their lives, thousands seriously injured, families WITHOUT loved ones.
You cannot compare equally, the wrong actions of BNP candidates and councilours to the above.
Did you vote for a skum bag MP who voted for war, shame knows your names.
Emma, what would be the point of an army air force or navy if they don’t do what the democratically elected government tell them to do? Regardless of whether you and I agree with it.
I’m sure, God forbid that if the bnp ever gained power, those idiots would drag not just us but the whole world into a racial war on scale that would make Hitler smile.
WTF is with your sig…..aint that racist?
FFS !
2 December, 2006 at 9:13 pm #251916@PB very fairly wrote:
Since it would appear from previous posts on the subject, a number of BNP Councillors have failed to pay even their rent, do you suppose that they will have paid their Council Tax???
@Emmaflush in reply wrote:
Why couldn’t they pay their rent and/or council tax?
The ”why” really is irrelevant. It is the fact that they DIDN’T pay that will prevent them from being able to vote. I know that both you and the BNP dislike the law of the land when it gets in the way of your rantings but hey … we live in a democracy eh???
@PB quite reasonably wrote:
After all if they haven’t, then they will hardly be able to fully carry out their duties and represent the people that voted for them.
@EmmaBNP in reply wrote:
Who’s fault is that?
Quite frankly it is entirely their own fault if they fail to pay their bills. I expect that they are far too busy rushing around from political meeting to political meeting, in between beating up women and starring in porn films.
They’d do better to spend a little bit of time on their own personal admin.
2 December, 2006 at 9:25 pm #251917shurrup ffs will ya`s !!!
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
:lol: :lol: :lol:
:lol:2 December, 2006 at 11:48 pm #251918@forumhostpb wrote:
The ”why” really is irrelevant.
Why? I put it to you, that you might find in your detective work, that there maybe reasonable reasons why it wasn’t payed, and that the “crime” and/or “bad” that you express as a sufficent detail of polution to the minds of the great un political washed who crave to accompany you on these boards, is wasted. I’ll leave that for you to search, you go use your pittifull 2MB connection now, go along, run on, then come back, come back with a educated response, make us aware of your sorrow that forth become you.
Quite frankly it is entirely their own fault if they fail to pay their bills. I expect that they are far too busy rushing around from political meeting to political meeting, in between beating up women and starring in porn films.
I can find you a magistrate to fullfill your statement underoath if you like?
Still no threads of political criminality of exposure about the old gang i see.
Are you a BNP member trying to expose the old gang from me, or just a spitefull tw@?
3 December, 2006 at 10:34 am #251919@emmalush wrote:
@forumhostpb wrote:
The ”why” really is irrelevant.
Why? I put it to you, that you might find in your detective work, that there maybe reasonable reasons why it wasn’t payed, and that the “crime” and/or “bad” that you express as a sufficent detail of polution to the minds of the great un political washed who crave to accompany you on these boards, is wasted. I’ll leave that for you to search, you go use your pittifull 2MB connection now, go along, run on, then come back, come back with a educated response, make us aware of your sorrow that forth become you.
Quite frankly it is entirely their own fault if they fail to pay their bills. I expect that they are far too busy rushing around from political meeting to political meeting, in between beating up women and starring in porn films.
I can find you a magistrate to fullfill your statement underoath if you like?
Still no threads of political criminality of exposure about the old gang i see.
Are you a BNP member trying to expose the old gang from me, or just a spitefull tw@?
No Emma- he’s just one who see’s all the truth not just some of the truth- and the fact that you continually defend criminality and criminal actions, just because it the party you support, and condemn criminality in others underlines your inability to understand reason, rationality and common sense.
3 December, 2006 at 11:13 am #251920@slayer wrote:
No Emma- he’s just one who see’s all the truth not just some of the truth- and the fact that you continually defend criminality and criminal actions
I was under the impression you were defending criminality and only saw some truth that suited you? I dont have any proof of it, but i dont need it do i…
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!