BNP expose London Transport’s anti-white campaign

@~Pebbles~ wrote:

I think its digusting that they are allowed to advertise in this way.

I saw another similar story recently, where white men were banned from fire brigade recruitment sessions because bosses want to hit their diversity targets.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=510418&in_page_id=1770

Had this open day been for white people only, there would have been an uproar.

My boss at work applied to go on a panel show, similar to question time (he loves politics). He sent his application on line and received an email back to say they already had enough of “his type” for the show.

White, middle aged and male.

@tilly Mint wrote:

@slayer wrote:

@tilly Mint wrote:

Colour is relevant. As described in Emmalush’s first post ‘The job is for “Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Students’ <

---

how is it not about colour?
White British people are being outcasted. While Non-White Brits or just general non-whites/ethnic groups are being favoured. This has everything to do with colour in the eyes of the narrow minded people responsible for the advertisment.

My god, not the sister of Emma Bush

ONE advert does not make a majority, of any description, outcasts (unless you wear blinkers like Bushy)- however you finally make the relevant point, This has EVERYTHING to do with the incompetents who put this advert together (which is worth a challenge under RRA section 37) and nothing to do with normal British citizens of any colour

If you take a single piece of evidence and use it to stereotype a group then scousers are drunken, theiving, illiterate, racists

But thats not true…is it?

Give the blinkers back to Bushy and think outside the box

Is it just one advert? I think you may find this happened more than just once. And I never said ‘one’ advert makes a ‘majority’ what I did say was that the majority of British people are ‘white’ – which is true, and only a minority are not white – which is also true!

YES- there will be other incompetent HR pink and fluffy nobodies out there who think that adverts like this promote a good image of a multi racial society when in fact it does the opposite. If 1% of adverts are ridiculous for being pompous, illegal nonsense- to blow that up as if it’s the “norm” shows a lack of any coherent argument and statements you make about whites being “second class citizens” simply isn’t true- it isnt the case and I could list a thousand reasons when you arent treated any differently than anyone else- in fact I am treated better and with more benefits (the perks not the cash type benefits) as a parent than anything to do with me being white or black or any other colour…but not many complain about that!

It is definitely true that Transport for London has an anti-white policy. All its buses have to be red. The normal livery colour of some of its contract operators’ buses, like FirstGroup and Stagecoach buses, is predominently white, with coloured decoration. So this gives an unfair bias to companies whose normal bus colour is red, and discriminates against companies who have to repaint their buses red so they can be used in London.

Oh, and a snippet fro todays news…jus to show that authorities treat everyone the same (unless of course you’re named Emma Bush and you wouldnt believe this)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/west_midlands/7224043.stm