Boards Index General discussion Getting serious Bloody useless social workers

Viewing 10 posts - 81 through 90 (of 147 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #386853

    All i want is the chance to set upon them, it aint much to ask eh

    #386854

    It’s just too painful for words. :cry:

    R. I. P. little one.

    xxxxx

    #386855

    @rubyred wrote:

    Poor wee Laddie. No peace in life and now, No peace in death. with thousands upon thousands of ‘well wishers’ trampling over his own personal space in death.

    well meaning ? yeah. ( maybe) . a memory and a thought would do me, and a promise IF i ever seen anything untoward I WOULD report it. Bat and I have had this conversation before. DONT turn this wee boy into a latter day Diana Spencer ffs !
    Use the negative energy to look after your own kids, and kids around you. We are ALL angry. but time to be positive and TRY and ensure it NEVER happens again.

    false grief will NOT allow little Peter Connolly to rise again. He will be with us in all our hearts, due to the sheer cruelty of this particular case.

    Suffice to say if Stephen Barker, Jason Barker and the woman?? ( tracey connolly) that birthed this wee laddie, were “set upon” .. all is fair in love ,war and memory !

    At the risk of being exceptionally pedantic, the above post which names the victim and the two previously un-named murderers is actually a contempt of court- perhaps a mod would care to check it out.

    I think it’s a very good idea to name them, unfortunately the court didnt.

    #386856

    Good point slayer. The BBC London News web page, going back to August 2007, openly named all three participants in this disgraceful affair. This page, which was available for public viewing up until this morning, has now been taken down…. presumably by the BBC.

    Since the information is apparently no longer in the public domain (from this ‘respected’ news source at any rate), then we should all now refrain from naming the three persons recently found guilty of assisting in the killing of ‘Baby P’.

    #386857

    feel free to edit PB.. NOT that im personally scared.. but if you fear there will be any comebacks to the site. Its common knowledge now, but it wont surprise me if the defence use the naming of them as a form of get out clause to free them !
    (stranger things have happened in law)

    and Pete. no its not much to ask for at all. ;)

    #386858

    Thanks Ruby. I don’t think that there’s a need to edit what WAS posted as it is (or was then at any rate) well in the public domain. Those who have read the names have read them and that cannot be undone.

    However, now that it has been brought to our attention, I guess that we all have an obligation not to further repeat these names in ‘public’.

    That said, I think that this only appears to apply to the mother, her (ex) husband, and her current partner (at least this month’s partner anyway). Her lodger however, HAS been named in all the mainstream Media so I presume that any ban on publicly naming him does not apply.

    I see that in today’s press, our wonderful caring Government has refused to publish the outcome of the in depth investigation that they ordered to be carried out in case it prejudices any action that they MIGHT take and because it would be soooooo unfair to name any social workers involved.

    Meanwhile the Socialist Republic of Haringey carries on as before. Business as usual eh?

    #386859

    @forumhostpb wrote:

    In a way it’s a pity that we don’t have capital punishment for this sort of crime any more. however, if we DID hang them, itt would only give the bleeding heart liberals something else to protest about.

    agreed..
    and ! why did you pinch my wasp ? i cant go about bein called ish ! can i !?! :shock:

    #386860

    @Rosepetal wrote:

    @bat wrote:

    How many more innocent children and babies have to die, before these useless incompetent social workers, get off of their backsides and DO something? Are they blind as well as stupid? What this poor baby went through doesn,t bear thinking about. They should sack bloody social workers. Time after time we hear the same old rubbish. “lessons will be learnt” or, “enquires will be made”. Fat lot of good that is after the poor child has died isn,t it? :evil: :evil: :evil:
    baby

    A few years ago I befriended a young mother of 3 aged 10 months to 5 years who had moved in over the road to me, lovely children impeccably dressed, well behaved a credit to their parents. One morning the mother knocked on my door at 8 in the morning saying her husband had hurt the baby. My son was 5 at the time so I had to take him with me to her house, my stomach lurched as I saw the 10 month old baby with burn blisters on his face and what seemed to be a grazed carpet burn on his cheek.

    The father was ordered to move out for 2 weeks, then let back on the condition he was not allowed to be alone with them. One evening, I knew the mother was out at work doing her cleaning job and the father was alone with them. I rang the Social Services, they asked me if I had the injunction number that prevented him from being alone with them, if I wasn’t so disgusted I would have laughed. They said in that case there is nothing we can do. The rage I felt propelled me to the doctors the next morning begging for valium or similar to help me sleep, something I had never done before. The doctor refused.

    I later found out that the father on previous occasions had burnt the baby with an iron and broken his arm. I will never forget the reaction of my 5 year old son after that morning when he turned to me and said I didn’t llike seeing that babys face mummy I think it really hurt him.

    They were allowed to continue living as a family and were rehoused for which I was grateful as when I observed the Social Workers visiting, restraining myself was more than I could bear. So forgive me if I have no faith whatsover in the Social Services. To this day I wonder how ever that women could live with that man!

    oh my god. you poor lass. and your little un as well. what a terrible thing to see and know, whats happening. i would have killed him rather than let him alone with them babies. you poor poor lass. [cuddles]

    #386861

    Socialism never killed this child PB.. a 6 foot 4 B.N.P member with a fascination for hitler and the reich, and Nazi imagery DID. and a so called “mother” let him do it.

    and they cannot be named as there is another case in the New year about the abuse to the sister. (3).

    #386862

    I’ll kill them quite happily and f*ck bleeding heart liberals they can camp outside my door and i’ll smile sweetly at them

Viewing 10 posts - 81 through 90 (of 147 total)

Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!