Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › Blazing vehicle driven into Glasgow airport
-
AuthorPosts
-
8 July, 2007 at 1:01 am #274670
Well firstly I aint fat, secondly me ma hails (well hailed) coincidentally enough from glasgow lol
Och, who’d have thought it eh?
Maybe if you didnt want such a “pedantic” response then you shouldnt have been so pedantic about the initial tongue in cheek post then eh?
And if I bore the tits off ya whats the problem? just dont read anything I write as its SOOOOO boring and then you wont have to have any menopausal tizzy fits will ya love?
Sorted :lol:
8 July, 2007 at 1:03 am #274671I would have actually had uberprick as a username if I’d thought it would have been allowed lol, its quite catchy really innit haha :lol:
8 July, 2007 at 10:05 am #274672@ubermik wrote:
@rubyred wrote:
these “drunken,foul mouthed,obnoxious,smelly layabouts.” Were some mothers sons,some fathers little girls.Much loved parents..
Get a Grip…PRI.CK !!
And oddly enough SO are all the kids, men and women who die as a direct result of our nose poking in countries that arent anything to do with us and which IS a large part of what drives the terrorists, or at the very least is part of what they use to drive their campaigning and recruitment
So maybe if people were more bothered about the much MUCH larger ammount of people our government kills in other countries we wouldnt have the mothers, fathers, children and uncles of THOSE dead killing folks over here eh?
IF, and its a very big if, lockerbie WAS a terrorist attack then as with the 7/7 bombings and the 9/11 fiasco it was as much a REaction as anything and was sorely deserved and by a huge magnitude far less collateral damage than the UK and US have inflicted elsewhere in the world
Or are we ONLY supposed to show fake concern over people dying when its on our soil?
Everyone is SOMEONES son or daughter, even the ragheads we’ve massacred by the score, but I bet niether of you threw a menopausal tizzy fit at any of that killing did ya? But a few most probably drunken and highly flammable scots………different story it seems lol
Don’t dare to presume on my reactions towards the slaughter performed on foreign soils in my name. And may I suggest you consider using an autocue..just so we can discern where the amusing parts of your tirades are supposed to be. Stupid boy!
8 July, 2007 at 6:25 pm #274673But canned laughter and autocues are for retards, so if you need them to feign seeing humour thats not really MY problem sweetie, its yours
8 July, 2007 at 10:09 pm #274674@ubermik wrote:
But canned laughter and autocues are for retards, so if you need them to feign seeing humour thats not really MY problem sweetie, its yours
Oh dear sonny..you really should learn to quit when you’re behind, and never, never to punch above your weight. You neither amuse nor inform..so please toddle off back to the daft-school.. there’s a good cretin.
8 July, 2007 at 10:25 pm #274675Is that the best you could come up with? REALLY?
Thats more the comeback someone has to resort to when they dont actually have a witty or cutting retort, I’m sure such a “scathing” response would have eight year old boys cowering in fear, unfortunately you missed catching me at that age by quite a bit petal
But with so many men being arse kissing pathetic panderers nowadays where the tit transporter gender are concerned I guess youre just used to not really having much more than an apologetic response, but the geriatric schoolteacher tone really is a bit old hat you know and only intimidates and immasculates those who live in those two states constantly to start with as well as being a bit “carry on”
Still, I guess everyone has their cieling eh? Be it a glass or intellectual one :lol:
8 July, 2007 at 10:34 pm #274676I see your powers of reasoned argument are about as good as your spelling. How frightfully sad for you. Sweet dreams Uberprick!
8 July, 2007 at 10:39 pm #274677And yet resorting to picking on typos or personal attacks are the path chosen by those with nothing more creative to add
Ho hum
Nighty night Doris
:lol:
10 July, 2007 at 6:07 pm #274678A terror suspect injured in the Glasgow terror attempt is unlikely to survive, one of his doctors has said.
(Advertisement)
A member of the medical team treating Kafeel Ahmed at the Royal Alexandra Hospital in Glasow said the man’s severe burns were likely to prove fatal.The doctor, speaking anonymously, said: “The prognosis is not good and he is not likely to survive.
“He has third-degree burns over most of his torso and limbs.
“It is beyond repair and because he has lost so much skin he is now vulnerable to infection and wont be able to fight it.”
Ahmed, 27, allegedly crashed a Jeep Cherokee into Glasgow Airport on June 30, a day after police found two unexploded car bombs in central London.
Photographs showed police wrestling a burning man to the ground.
Prosecutors suspect Ahmed, an aeronautical engineer from India, carried out the attempted bombings in London before returning to Scotland.
Ahmed was initially treated at the Royal Alexandra Hospital in Paisley.
He was transferred under sedation to the Glasgow Royal Infirmary in the early hours of Monday in an intensive care ambulance.
He is under constant armed police guard. The medical team member who discussed his condition could not confirm if police had been able to question him.
:: Bilal Abdullah, 27, has been charged in connection with the attempted attacks in London and Glasgow.
Seven other people have been arrested by police in Britain and Australia.
Bleedin shame aint mite not make… hope he actually suffers badly before seein if his 1000’s of virgins awaitin him….. effin loon deserves to be toast,,,
10 July, 2007 at 7:43 pm #274679It would have been better to have just put a bullet in his face at the time then rather than waste limited NHS resources on the scum :lol:
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!