-
Posts
-
CONTROVERSY IN LAWS EXIST eh Linda
Show me the sources of your controversy Linda
Show me the sources…..
I’m waiting
Oh warhol.. I gave you one area to research. Why don’t you expand your mind and knowledge by doing your own you lazy person!
Or should I say “love is all I bring here, mother connection, or rather my nipples are getting hard.” BOLLOX umm you have much me thinks.
I DID do my own research Linda – I DID expand my mind and I couldn’t find ANY evidence that legitimately challenged Kamala Harris’ ability to become President. Oh yes, there was some of rumour perpetrated by facebook users but that has been totally debunked by experts.
THE FACTS as reported by AP News:
Facebook users are spreading a false claim that Harris is not able to serve as president.
“I can’t believe people are making this idiotic comment,” Laurence Tribe, a Harvard University professor of constitutional law, told The Associated Press in 2019, when similar false claims emerged about Harris during her presidential run.
Since she was born in the U.S., she is regarded a natural born citizen under the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.
SO, Linda, I challenge you to put up a single piece of evidence for your case and not hide behind accusations of laziness because all you have is trumpist rumour. I hope you can otherwise the Harvard University professor is calling you an idiot.
PUT UP OR SHUT UP Linda
PUT UP OR SHUT UP
-
This reply was modified 4 years ago by
cooldandywarhol.
DONT BE F…..N RUDE… I AM A LADY NOT YOUR DIRT U TOSS ON WOMAN SO THEY SWOON TO YOUR EVERY WORD. NO WEAKLING HERE BUD…
CONTROVERSY…. JURISDICTION…
“The word jurisdiction is also used to refer to particular legal systems, as in the law varies in different jurisdiction, and in the sense of territory (coupled with authority to reach conduct within the territory as within the jurisdiction of X State.” Find your own legal dictionary that is valid..
So again Harris was born in America. Yes a citizen. Her parents in the State of California were not legal citizens..nor here 14 years prior to marriage….and her birth. That was California law then. Not been amended I am aware of or have access to a law library right now due to covid… parents had to be naturalized on her birth neither were. Then her parents divorced and she moved to Canada WITH HER MOM
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS REQUIREMENTS FOR PRESIDENT U.S.A. NATIONAL ARCHIVES 14TH AMENDMENT (1868) U.S. CONSTITUTION ARTICLE 11, SECT 1
“ALL persons born or naturalized in the U S. And subject TO THE JURISDICTION THEREOF, are citizens of the u.s. and the STATE WHERE IN THEY RESIDE.”
1 member liked this post.
Now you pick and decide but not complete what read…
FATCHECK U.S.A. TODAY….
STATED
“If biden can not serve his full term she can not by constitutional law become President. She is an anchor baby..mother from India, father Jamician..and neither were American citizens at time of her birth. Presidency falls on Speaker of House..
1 member liked this post.
Linda, your research is total bullshit. You’ve quoted a line from a USA Today story that concluded the accusation was FALSE. A typical trumper tactic of wanton ignorance.
READ THE STORY LINDA
Have you read it Linda. HAVE YOU READ IT ?
Neither did u offer it all up.
JURISDICTION and I gave u law and site. I take that as controversy
You’re writing nonsense Linda. Read the article.
I did and both were summation of the Laws. So both had good points and the later won cause that what he said it true?
CONTROVERSY. Still disputed. If wanted to stir pot would.. democracts squashing it. Media
I provided constitution meaning of Jurisdiction.
-
This reply was modified 4 years ago by lindaclemenza7.
PARENTS HAVE TO BE NATURAL BORN
-
This reply was modified 4 years ago by
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!