-
Posts
-
@forumhostpb wrote:
@emmalush wrote:
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
It’s astonishing that you think you ‘re a victim of racial discrimination
Whats wrong with being a victim of racial discrimination? I would’ve thought it nice that someone understands the difference between one thing or another, or understands good racial taste?
Er…. forgive me for appearing to be a complete ignoramus in these mattters Emma dear, but what on earth is “good racial taste” ?????
Anyone that understands the good in the races that i belong to, has good taste. It is great to discriminate on racial grounds, it is great to discriminate.
Geoff, to be fair mate, if the “likes” of the BNP gain from the mess created by the old gang, that is not their “fault”.
You are certainly not racist for mentioning it, you are a realist, and we need more folk like you saying these things. Maybe if millions did, the BNP wouldn’t exist?
@emmalush wrote:
The reason this law isnt abolished, and the reason people have anti-white racist problems expressed above, is because our rulers want to implement a marxist style communistic state, everyone equal – everyone the same.
So if your white and/or hetrosexual and/or fairly well of, basicly different to the cultural new comers to this countries society, then expect to be treated unfairly.
Never a truer word spoken. I wont go into detail, but i have recently had a personal experience where racism against white people is rife! But apparently there is no such thing as racism towards white people. Same old story…….if a black/asian lad gets beaten by a group of white lads, its a racist attack! A white lad gets beaten by black/asian lads its assault!
Trust me this country is going to the dogs and its no wonder ppl are moving abroad to get awy from this shit. Our country is so greedy it will let anybody in and whilst allowing this the country neglects its own! Didnt Enoch Powel warn us this would happen. But in good old fashion greed the government knows best!
@geoff wrote:
I’ll leave PB’s question to be answered, but this country is becoming a racially segregated system, thanks to these utterly ridiculous liberalised laws we are having to deal with. We are becoming sectioned by the politicians and more and more British (not white, but British) people are becoming more and more sick to death of it. There will come a time when it breaks down and sectarianism will start to flourish, and the likes of the BNP will eat into those areas of unrest.
Why will they get the popular vote? It’s very easily answered is it not?
British people are sick of being treated like second class citizens in their own homeland. They are sick of being told quotas in the employment system. They are sick of illegal/detentioned immigrants wasting honest, decent working peoples money. They are sick of these immigrant families shacking up in the inner cities, paid for by the state. They are sick of being told they are racist. They are sick to the back teeth of walking on egg shells in the country of their birth because politicians see fit to allow this country to be a state for refugees. Call me racist for outlining it.
In the words of Catherine Tate … am I bovvered??? Yes I am … deeply.
Racial segregation and liberalism are incompatible so your comment that liberal laws are causing segregation makes no sense at all. Sectarianism is what the BNP want, they don’t want harmony or unity, they want unrest which is why they cause trouble all across the country. The reason why some people vote BNP is simply because they are either racist or ignorant and the ignorant ones don’t realize that a vote for the BNP acts as an endorsement of ALL of the BNP’s neo-nazi views.
The idea that British people are second class citizens in the UK is one of the most stupid things anybody could say. The facts simply do not support this absurd claim. White, British people have practically all the power in this country in all spheres of British life e.g. political, economic, religious, entertainment, sport, legal, policing, etc. So how can British people be 2nd class citizens and run everything at the same time?????
Some employers have targets for women, disabled and ethnic minority employees but that doesn’t necessarily mean that they would turn down a candidate not belonging to one of those groups. Think of it as a case of belonging to one of those groups being a tie-breaker if all other things are equal.
With regard to immigration, I’ve stated time and time again that illegal immigration is usually caused by people not being able to make a decent living in their own country (so they look for work in other countries). This problem requires a global solution to help eradicate poverty and create the right environment for poorer countries to maximize their economic potential. As for immigrant families living in inner cities, they help keep those cities running. Apart from those immigrants who work in white-collar professional roles, there are a lot who work very long hours doing less pleasant jobs (usually for a pittance).
All this moaning about refugees is pathetic. Do you really think the UK is the only country in the world that takes refugees? You’ll find that it’s the poorest countries in the world who take the biggest burden of the world’s refugees. The countries that can least afford to deal with refugees take the biggest amount and yet people who live in affluent countries like the UK whinge and moan like a bunch of spoilt brats.
It’s staggering that people who have a comfortable life in the UK are struck with such self-pity. So a few immigrants work in the UK, so you can’t make racist comments without criticism anymore – Boo fuking hoo! My heart bleeds for you. Let’s throw you a pity party.
@tadpole wrote:
@emmalush wrote:
The reason this law isnt abolished, and the reason people have anti-white racist problems expressed above, is because our rulers want to implement a marxist style communistic state, everyone equal – everyone the same.
So if your white and/or hetrosexual and/or fairly well of, basicly different to the cultural new comers to this countries society, then expect to be treated unfairly.
Never a truer word spoken. I wont go into detail, but i have recently had a personal experience where racism against white people is rife! But apparently there is no such thing as racism towards white people. Same old story…….if a black/asian lad gets beaten by a group of white lads, its a racist attack! A white lad gets beaten by black/asian lads its assault!
Trust me this country is going to the dogs and its no wonder ppl are moving abroad to get awy from this Hot Chocolate. Our country is so greedy it will let anybody in and whilst allowing this the country neglects its own! Didnt Enoch Powel warn us this would happen. But in good old fashion greed the government knows best!
The old gang parties see it like this, if they let in people who really want and need to come here, then there more likely to vote for the party that lets em in.
The prodomanent people’s of England need to wake up fast, because like you mention, Enoch will be proved right albeit 25 years later than first thought.
What will it take for them to wake up, a 50-50 bablance?
mr bigastuff, the BNP do want harmony, segregation will provide that, because integration causes disharmony. Unity is something that works in ones mind, we are different people, we dont all think along the same unity lines.
Voting for the old gang multiculturalists, creates diverse harm. You welcome harm.
We dont have to go to work to feed the worlds poor, and we certainly dont have to go to work to allow the worlds poor to live off our backs. If you wana help the worlds poor, do it off your own back, and stop being ignorant by fascistly saying everyone should help.
I think many that voted new labour did so on the basis that £7.5 billion of tax payers money would be sent to africa. Seems like folk need to learn the hard way.
@emmalush wrote:
I think many that voted new labour did so on the basis that £7.5 billion of tax payers money would be sent to africa. Seems like folk need to learn the hard way.
Fulfilling a promise made in last November’s pre-Budget report, Mr Brown said the aid budget would increase by £1.5bn to reach almost £4.6bn in 2005/06.
That equates to 0.4% of national income, less than half a penny in every pound.
In November last year, Mr Brown hitched his wagon to an ambitious initiative from the UN, which aims to boost aid from the rich world by $50bn a year to almost $100bn.
Over the next 14 years, the UN aims to halve global poverty, reduce infant mortality by two-thirds, and make primary education available to all the world’s children.
@emmalush wrote:
The CEED (Charity) Limited operates Positive Action Traineeships under section 37 of the Race Relations Act (1976), designed to develop individual skills and train adults, from Black and other minority ethnic groups, for entry into technical, medical or professional positions where they are currently under-represented.
To be eligible for the Positive Action Training Programme you must be of black or other minority ethnic origin, i.e. African, Asian, Caribbean, Chinese (section 37 of the Race Relations Act [1976] applies).
The Traineeships are supported with funding from the European Social Fund.
http://www.ceed.co.uk/index.php?page=vacancies.php&open=1
Should white people be given the same human rights?
The 1974 Sex discrimination act allows for positive discrimination in favour of a minority sex in a particular area (this invariably tends to be women)
Shouldn’t men be given the same human rights as women?
Absolutely slayer.
Im puzzled, what do you mean by positive discrimination? Discrimination is positive full stop isnt it?
@emmalush wrote:
Absolutely slayer.
Im puzzled, what do you mean by positive discrimination? Discrimination is positive full stop isnt it?
positive discrimination is a spin word for favouring a particular section of society to ensure there voice has a representation i.e. the use of all women candidates lists for constituency elections ensures women have a more representative voice in parliament which otherwise would not have been heard
@ugo wrote:
shuuuurrrup Toxen you nerd :^o
ugo? go back to your colouring book leave this thread for those who know how to read ok
anyone with an ounce of intelligence could see that the name is token with a K no X
now sit down like a good boy il get you some juice
@slayer wrote:
@emmalush wrote:
Absolutely slayer.
Im puzzled, what do you mean by positive discrimination? Discrimination is positive full stop isnt it?
positive discrimination is a spin word for favouring a particular section of society to ensure there voice has a representation i.e. the use of all women candidates lists for constituency elections ensures women have a more representative voice in parliament which otherwise would not have been heard
I thought you might say that. So you think it would be better for you to be represented in Parliament by someone less qualified to do the job, possibly not qualified, just because they were born with a virgina and breasts…
You can understand why i think your political and social views are sometimes pathetic…
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!