Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › An example of prudes going to far?
-
AuthorPosts
-
4 August, 2006 at 12:16 am #232951
@drivel wrote:
@becky wrote:
@drivel wrote:
having a pee , is the most natural thing in the world too – but you don’t lowp your d ick out , or drop your sloggis in the middle of tesco’s car park and have a pee – unless you are a geordie of course !!!
How can you even say the 2 things in the same sentance. Feeding EATING is life or death, sometimes you dont even know a woman is feeding it can be done so discreetly. Its a big fuss over nothing. What about labour programmes on in the afternoon showing EVERYTHING are they wrong to show nature??
It doesn’t bother me in the slightest Becky if a lady want’s to get her breasts out in public – but why all the fuss about it
Why get them out to prove the point that this is 2006 and yes its pcSurely its better to go somewhere private – most supermarkets have feeding rooms now – and do it there
All this new age pc – I’m a modern woman – I can get my tits out anywhere I want to feed my baby – is just a bit ott – methinks
i fail to see what your comments have to do with a magazine cover ??? am i missing something ?? unless you mean the woman being photographed ?? well im sure that it would have been taken in a private photography room, (which was then downloaded onto the world wide web so narrow minded, sexually frustrated deviant bafoons could use its ‘potentially’ peadophillic content as a way to relieve their desires.)
or better still maybe it was used as a magazine shoot to inform people of the fact that breast feeding is not only good for the well being of the said infant, it is also beneficial emotionally and financially to all in question. breast feeding is an essential part of nature and to use such an inane context as ‘weeing in the street’ astounds me drivel, i really expected a more mature and well worded argument for your opinion on this matter !!! :roll:
4 August, 2006 at 9:10 am #232952@sweetasbaileez wrote:
@drivel wrote:
@becky wrote:
@drivel wrote:
having a pee , is the most natural thing in the world too – but you don’t lowp your d ick out , or drop your sloggis in the middle of tesco’s car park and have a pee – unless you are a geordie of course !!!
How can you even say the 2 things in the same sentance. Feeding EATING is life or death, sometimes you dont even know a woman is feeding it can be done so discreetly. Its a big fuss over nothing. What about labour programmes on in the afternoon showing EVERYTHING are they wrong to show nature??
It doesn’t bother me in the slightest Becky if a lady want’s to get her breasts out in public – but why all the fuss about it
Why get them out to prove the point that this is 2006 and yes its pcSurely its better to go somewhere private – most supermarkets have feeding rooms now – and do it there
All this new age pc – I’m a modern woman – I can get my tits out anywhere I want to feed my baby – is just a bit ott – methinks
i fail to see what your comments have to do with a magazine cover ??? am i missing something ?? unless you mean the woman being photographed ?? well im sure that it would have been taken in a private photography room, (which was then downloaded onto the world wide web so narrow minded, sexually frustrated deviant bafoons could use its ‘potentially’ peadophillic content as a way to relieve their desires.)
or better still maybe it was used as a magazine shoot to inform people of the fact that breast feeding is not only good for the well being of the said infant, it is also beneficial emotionally and financially to all in question. breast feeding is an essential part of nature and to use such an inane context as ‘weeing in the street’ astounds me drivel, i really expected a more mature and well worded argument for your opinion on this matter !!! :roll:
I didn’t mentione weeing in the street !! – I just said peeing was natural too – yet we do it in private
All i’m saying is – what’s the hurry – find a feeding place and feed the baby – or go to your car – or go home
It doesn’t bother me in the slightest – the picture is obviously modelled -as most of you ladies have saggy tits anyway
I just can’t understand why you feel the need to breastfeed in public4 August, 2006 at 9:54 am #232953Actually in Broard Street in Birmingham ( a row of nightclubs) has built some outdoor urinals so men dont pee in the street now these can be seen by everyone in the street so whats your views on this? I will go get a link for you.
4 August, 2006 at 10:01 am #232954Women who breast feed could, remain at home chained to a sink!!!
However in this enlightened day and age it is not only bottle fed babies who get taken out by their mothers :lol:Unfortunately babies tend to be fed on demand….. 4hr between feeds..worthwhile aiming for… but babies being babies tend to ignore this clockwatching stuff and omg… cry when they are hungry.
Therefore……If the woman has dared to go out with her children :shock: and the baby wants fed……
Em of course men don’t pee in the streets etc but they can pee in any toilet or behind any tree!!
A woman may choose to feed her baby in the nearest loo… but have you seen some of the public loos…surreptitiously lurking behind a tree trying to feed a baby is not the best option either, juggling shopping, toddler, baby and pushchair etc behind a tree is most likely multi tasking taken too far
The other alternative is just tell the baby to wait untill mummy gets home!!!!! Note that not all mothers have the luxury of a car..I certainly didn’t when my children were small.
However using common sense…which is what women do best anyway :lol:
They find a quiet wee spot (again note no trees) and discreetly feed the baby. Certainly better for the surrounding environment than a baby screaming until mum gets home just to ensure that the shocked prudes and the mad sex maniacs are not either offended or aroused!!! :roll: :roll: :roll:4 August, 2006 at 10:25 am #232955@wilma wrote:
Women who breast feed could, remain at home chained to a sink!!!
However in this enlightened day and age it is not only bottle fed babies who get taken out by their mothers :lol:Unfortunately babies tend to be fed on demand….. 4hr between feeds..worthwhile aiming for… but babies being babies tend to ignore this clockwatching stuff and omg… cry when they are hungry.
Therefore……If the woman has dared to go out with her children :shock: and the baby wants fed……
Em of course men don’t pee in the streets etc but they can pee in any toilet or behind any tree!!
A woman may choose to feed her baby in the nearest loo… but have you seen some of the public loos…surreptitiously lurking behind a tree trying to feed a baby is not the best option either, juggling shopping, toddler, baby and pushchair etc behind a tree is most likely multi tasking taken too far
The other alternative is just tell the baby to wait untill mummy gets home!!!!! Note that not all mothers have the luxury of a car..I certainly didn’t when my children were small.
However using common sense…which is what women do best anyway :lol:
They find a quiet wee spot (again note no trees) and discreetly feed the baby. Certainly better for the surrounding environment than a baby screaming until mum gets home just to ensure that the shocked prudes and the mad sex maniacs are not either offended or aroused!!! :roll: :roll: :roll:That’s a very sensible and well constructed reply – no less than I expecte from Wilmers
And that’s all I was meaning – find a nice quiet place and do the business discreetly – the others seem to be advocating immediate strips as soon as the baby opens it’s mouth !!!
4 August, 2006 at 10:26 am #232956@becky wrote:
Actually in Broard Street in Birmingham ( a row of nightclubs) has built some outdoor urinals so men dont pee in the street now these can be seen by everyone in the street so whats your views on this? I will go get a link for you.
I find that very “French” Becky
But there again what can you expect from Birmingham – we are much more civilised in Geordieland !!!
4 August, 2006 at 5:17 pm #232957@drivel wrote:
@becky wrote:
Actually in Broard Street in Birmingham ( a row of nightclubs) has built some outdoor urinals so men dont pee in the street now these can be seen by everyone in the street so whats your views on this? I will go get a link for you.
I find that very “French” Becky
But there again what can you expect from Birmingham – we are much more civilised in Geordieland !!!
LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Really is that why so many people die each year from alcohol related illnesses??? Really civilised yeah.
4 August, 2006 at 5:30 pm #232958http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/5243402.stm
Now tell me whos civilised?
4 August, 2006 at 6:50 pm #232959@tommy ToXen wrote:
All I can say is the lot of you are sick.
And you will all burn in hell for your crimes.
I think maybe you should be the one to burn in hell Tom, for sexualising such a natural act. I agree with everyone else on here that have said it’s the most natural thing in the world, and that people like yourself who see a problem in it, therefore sexualising it, are the ones with the real problem.
I cant remeber who now, but someone mentiioned something about the Daily Star, and the amount of almost bare a@ses omitting from it’s front cover. I don’t suppose any of you narrow minded males find a problem with that, no, your more likely to be found drooling over those images :roll:
4 August, 2006 at 7:03 pm #232960@drivel wrote:
@sweetasbaileez wrote:
@drivel wrote:
@becky wrote:
@drivel wrote:
having a pee , is the most natural thing in the world too – but you don’t lowp your d ick out , or drop your sloggis in the middle of tesco’s car park and have a pee – unless you are a geordie of course !!!
How can you even say the 2 things in the same sentance. Feeding EATING is life or death, sometimes you dont even know a woman is feeding it can be done so discreetly. Its a big fuss over nothing. What about labour programmes on in the afternoon showing EVERYTHING are they wrong to show nature??
It doesn’t bother me in the slightest Becky if a lady want’s to get her breasts out in public – but why all the fuss about it
Why get them out to prove the point that this is 2006 and yes its pcSurely its better to go somewhere private – most supermarkets have feeding rooms now – and do it there
All this new age pc – I’m a modern woman – I can get my tits out anywhere I want to feed my baby – is just a bit ott – methinks
i fail to see what your comments have to do with a magazine cover ??? am i missing something ?? unless you mean the woman being photographed ?? well im sure that it would have been taken in a private photography room, (which was then downloaded onto the world wide web so narrow minded, sexually frustrated deviant bafoons could use its ‘potentially’ peadophillic content as a way to relieve their desires.)
or better still maybe it was used as a magazine shoot to inform people of the fact that breast feeding is not only good for the well being of the said infant, it is also beneficial emotionally and financially to all in question. breast feeding is an essential part of nature and to use such an inane context as ‘weeing in the street’ astounds me drivel, i really expected a more mature and well worded argument for your opinion on this matter !!! :roll:
I didn’t mentione weeing in the street !! – I just said peeing was natural too – yet we do it in private
All i’m saying is – what’s the hurry – find a feeding place and feed the baby – or go to your car – or go home
It doesn’t bother me in the slightest – the picture is obviously modelled -as most of you ladies have saggy tits anyway
I just can’t understand why you feel the need to breastfeed in publicand if your child is hungry ?? do you think …. hold on …. i need to get my child out of public view ?? and you did state…if i need to wee…..i better not do it in the sight of the public…… get a grip drivel.. i respect your views hun cos ur smart and literate…but ffs we are talking about feeding a bloody baby here…do you honestly think they care !!!
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!