Boards Index › Chat rooms – the forum communities › Chat forum three boards › All That Glitters……………..
-
AuthorPosts
-
11 December, 2011 at 3:59 pm #16997
Charlie was so excited and looking forward to making his Christmas card, he’d had a bad morning he’d fallen off a bike in the playground and screamed so loud even the ‘wellard’ caretaker came running out his workshop and grunted “You ok boy”? He was ok though, was just graze, the first aider cleaned him up and he limped unneccesarily for a couple of hours but the mention of making his Christmas card soon took his mind of it.
I’d collected all the paraphernalia they would need, I’d even stolen the best quality glitter from the Rottweiler Head of Art’s cupboard while she wasn’t looking (she seemed to think it was only to be used for 4th year and above) but I think 2nd years should have equal opportunities. I’d ordered a huge bag of sparkly jewels but my OCD for all things that glitter and shine just wouldn’t allow me to let them be used just yet. I’d have to admire them tumbling over each other in the plastic bag in a hidden drawer for at least another term!
As I sat with Charlie his chubby little fingers struggled to cut out a snow man he’d drawn round and when he applied the glue to stick it on the card he put it on the wrong side, “No worries” I said we can still put some glue on the back and the glue on the front will dry clear and he will look nice and shiny. He then put dabs of glue on the snowman’s head and tried to stick some sequins to it, they stuck to his fingers so we poked them off with pencil which worked very well. The snowman look resplendent with his ragged edges and a green shiny star for his nose (set to the left a bit but who cares).
I gritted my teeth when he decided he wanted the quality silver sprinkled all over the snowman, I wanted it to go round the class and Charlie didn’t have the best co-ordination but he had grazed his knee and it had to be all his own work. I thought quickly and sellotaped a few of the sprinkle holes in the container just in case. I didn’t really mind when a little bit of glitter tumbled on to my new M and S trousers, what the hell there was glue and red paint on them already!
“That looks lovely Charlie” I exclaimed “I’ll put it on the radiator to dry now”. He beamed with pride and sat there peeling off the pva glue he’d got plastered all over his little hands.
Later in the afternoon I told him it was dry and asked him if he wanted to address the envelope for his card to Mum and Dad or Mummy and Daddy. “No”! he said ” Could you write Heaven on it please”. I looked into his sweet little face and asked “Why heaven Charlie”, as he looked up at me he said “Because my Grandad died last Christmas of cancer and I miss him, I want to send it to him”! “Well that’s fine Charlie” I replied ” So how do you fancy sticking some lovely sparkly jewels on that card?”……………..
11 December, 2011 at 4:06 pm #484593wonderful Rose………..can so relate to all that you wrote……..had something very similar two years ago……….just think prison instead of heaven and mum.
xxx
11 December, 2011 at 6:23 pm #484594Nicely penned Rose, ever thought of spinning off a chapter or two ? :lol:
11 December, 2011 at 6:36 pm #484595nice one rose :wink: x
11 December, 2011 at 6:38 pm #484596/gulp. that moved me Rose, thanks x
11 December, 2011 at 8:40 pm #484597im not beng pedantic
good story yep
but the true cliche
is all that glisters is not gold.12 December, 2011 at 8:39 am #484598@best man wrote:
im not beng pedantic
good story yep
but the true cliche
is all that glisters is not gold.I was holding back from saying the same thing – life’s too short, I thought. But evidently it wasn’t too short for me to look this up in an online dictionary:
“The original form of this phrase was ‘all that glisters is not gold’. The ‘glitters’ version of the phrase long ago superseded the original and is now almost universally used.
Shakespeare is the best-known writer to have expressed this idea. The original Shakespeare editions of The Merchant of Venice, 1596, have the line as ‘all that glisters is not gold’. ‘Glister’ is usually replaced by ‘glitter’ in renditions of the play: . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . The Bard was by no means the first to suggest that ‘all that glitters/glisters is not gold’. The 12th century . . . . in 1553, we have Thomas Becon,. .. . . . George Turberville, in Tragical tales, (and other poems), 1587 . . . .
The ‘glitters’ version of this phrase is so long established as to be perfectly acceptable – especially as ‘glisters’ and ‘glitters’ mean the same thing and are essentially synonymous. Only the most pedantic insist that ‘all that glisters is not gold’ is correct and that ‘all that glitters is not gold’, being a misquotation, however cobweb-laden, , should be shunned. John Dryden was quite happy to use ‘glitters’ as long ago as 1687, in his poem, The Hind and the Panther . . . “
So although I am amongst the most pedantic (no surprise there!) I am not quickest off the mark . . . . . . :oops: :oops: :oops:
12 December, 2011 at 10:05 am #484599Words….. Great post … You’re so fair minded and articulate! :D
And your chat name …. Well what else could it possibly be ….
:lol:
12 December, 2011 at 9:56 pm #484600@pepsi wrote:
Words….. Great post … You’re so fair minded and articulate! :D
And your chat name …. Well what else could it possibly be ….
:lol:
Oh gwaaaan!
:oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!