-
Posts
-
How does the beheading of one man stack up against the systematic destruction of a city and the slaughter of the civilian population, by US missiles. (all except the Oil Ministry building of course)
What city? Are we talking about Hiroshima or Nagasaki? Japan doesn’t have any oil reserves. Anyway, it wasn’t missiles, the A-bombs were dropped on parachutes.
It now emerges that Zaqarwi was trying to start a war between the USA and Iran, both enemies of Al Qaeda.
In a war or an international dispute there are SIDES. We have to accept that we are on the western side unless we want to be wiped out by a globalised Taliban. If our side has nukes that’s a good thing but if the enemy has them it’s a bad thing.
In football if our team scores a goal we think its a good thing but we do our best to stop the opposition from getting the ball and scoring against us. It’s the same in international conflict if the situation has gone beyond being negotiable.
I don’t like wars, I wish they didn’t happen but when they do the psychology is similar to sport. In fact war is, in a sense, a serious, deadly, and obscene sport . Not so much for the humble American GI’s or Al Qaeda’s suicide bombers – they are just pawns, but for the planners and experts behind them.
What city? Are we talking about Hiroshima or Nagasaki? Japan doesn’t have any oil reserves. Anyway, it wasn’t missiles, the A-bombs were dropped on parachutes.
If you just want to be silly why join a serious subject, you know perfectly well it refers to Bagdhad
It now emerges that Zaqarwi was trying to start a war between the USA and Iran, both enemies of Al Qaeda.
And when did you meet him and discuss his future plans
As to a war between US and Iran, don’t you keep up with the world situation, the US are making a good attempt at it without anyones help..
In a war or an international dispute there are SIDES. We have to accept that we are on the western side unless we want to be wiped out by a globalised Taliban. If our side has nukes that’s a good thing but if the enemy has them it’s a bad thing.
Why, I am against the West in this instance, they were wrong to attack Iraq, more and more are coming to that conclusion, even the US public support is waning.
“wiped out by a globalised Taliban” these are the sort of ridiculous claims that led to the Iraqi invasion.If everybody has nukes people will think twice about using them, or are you too young to remember the cold war.
Why do you think the US is against the possibility of Iran getting them, they don’t want equality, they want to be top dogs with the big stick.In football if our team scores a goal we think its a good thing but we do our best to stop the opposition from getting the ball and scoring against us. It’s the same in international conflict if the situation has gone beyond being negotiable.
But unfortunately our defenders have had too many “own goals”
The situation only went beyond negotiable because of the West’s unnecessary actions.Quote:
In a war or an international dispute there are SIDES. We have to accept that we are on the western side unless we want to be wiped out by a globalised Taliban. If our side has nukes that’s a good thing but if the enemy has them it’s a bad thing.Why, I am against the West in this instance, they were wrong to attack Iraq, more and more are coming to that conclusion, even the US public support is waning.
“wiped out by a globalised Taliban” these are the sort of ridiculous claims that led to the Iraqi invasion.If everybody has nukes people will think twice about using them, or are you too young to remember the cold war.
Why do you think the US is against the possibility of Iran getting them, they don’t want equality, they want to be top dogs with the big stick.In football if our team scores a goal we think its a good thing but we do our best to stop the opposition from getting the ball and scoring against us. It’s the same in international conflict if the situation has gone beyond being negotiable.
But unfortunately our defenders have had too many “own goals”
The situation only went beyond negotiable because of the West’s unnecessary actions.I am slightly happier about the US being top dogs than the Iranians – get real and forget the 70’s student politiics!!!! We might not like Bush but he’s a better bet than Ahmadinejad when it comes to the world stage.
We might not like Bush but he’s a better bet than Ahmadinejad when it comes to the world stage.
You think so, Ahmadinejad is just a possibility, Bush is a reality, a man whose ideas have created horror and atrocities for the people of Iraq.
See today that US deaths in Iraq have reached 2.500,
Its you that needs to get real, open your eyes and your mind, its the US that created the Middle East problems.
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!