al-Zarqawi ‘Eliminated’

@tiler wrote:

The point is, he is against Western terrorism, and the Iraqi’s who support the Western terrorists. and any others who do the same.

Words are only words on a screen, observing the actions, are much more informative.

The word terrorist is bandied about in many cases illogically, where is the difference about those that send missiles into civilian areas, and a suicide bomber in a civilian area, both are terrible acts,

At least the s/bomber has the courage to give his life, whereas those sending the missiles sit nice and safe, in their hidey holes.

Western words are full of hypocrisy, about bringing freedom and democracy, its pure greed and establishing a power base in the Middle East, to support the Israeli terror regime.

Yes, Tiler is takes a real “terrorist” to behead an unarmed bound man- tell me how Zaqwari having the courage to send dozens of suicide bombers from his “safe, hidey hole” is any different to others in Iraq sending their denizens of death into people’s homes and streets- why didnt he become one of them?

Your ignorance in suggesting the Shia’s support America and hence are a justifiable target is barking. I am wholly and totally against this war but even more against fools like you who find reason to justify those who commit evil

@tiler wrote:

When you think about, here was a man, who was shunned by the Iraqi leader, yet went to help the Iraqi people to fight against the Western terrorist invasion and destruction of their country, who gave his life for others in desperare need, to rid their country of invaders and killers. 8)

All his life was dedicated to fighting Western aggression and terrorism, :!:

He was betrayed by Moslems though wasn’t he?

He was betrayed by Moslems though wasn’t he?

Was he, or is that what the US said. :?:

---

Drivel,
Yes a small incident in a much larger picture containing much larger actions, you don’t worry about the equivalent of a mark on the wallpaper, when the house is being destroyed.

How does the beheading of one man stack up against the systematic destruction of a city and the slaughter of the civilian population, by US missiles. (all except the Oil Ministry building of course)

Drivel
There was nothing hidden about his motives, he was there to fight the invaders, and occupiers of a country they had no right to be in.

Its much more difficult to see the hidden motives of Bush and Blair, how many have to suffer and die for their motives, the “democracy” card is a crock of garbage, its the oil and a power base.

America will never leave, until the American people are sick of the body bags increasing, Blair is a fool for tagging along, behind a maniac, who hears voices from god.

The US is withdrawing troops from Afghanistan, so its another place for British troops to die, the Russians gave up on that country, so the US is leaving it to our poor sods to die for their failures.

@slayer wrote:

He was there to fight in a country he had no right to be in either- he was not an Iraqi but Jordanian

He was there as an ally of Iraqi Muslims, irrespective of his nationality, or aren’t they allowed allies.

As previously stated, opposition to a foolish, ill judged, misguided and deliberate war does not justify support for an evil, psychological, callous butcher

I agree about the war, but it depends who you are referring to about the “evil, psychological, callous butcher” bit, if its Bush I definitely agree with you, otherwise no.

You may call him a terrorist, yet he gave his life fighting for an occupied people, who had seen their people slaughtered by US missiles.
Remember many British did the same in the 40’s