Boards Index › Chat rooms – the forum communities › Chat forum three boards › A school photo with a difference.
-
AuthorPosts
-
8 June, 2012 at 8:41 pm #498510
the photo’s still up then? :roll:
8 June, 2012 at 8:44 pm #4985118 June, 2012 at 9:03 pm #498512@terry wrote:
@tinks wrote:
the photo’s still up then? :roll:
:-s
[-o< Give me strength…
say what you want but after a few phone calls made ……you are definately walking on dodgey ground……..at the very least the children’s faces should be blurred out……….you are not above the law Terry whatever you believe yourself to be.
8 June, 2012 at 9:07 pm #498513@tinks wrote:
@terry wrote:
@tinks wrote:
the photo’s still up then? :roll:
:-s
[-o< Give me strength…
say what you want but after a few phone calls made ……you are definately walking on dodgey ground……..at the very least the children’s faces should be blurred out……….you are not above the law Terry whatever you believe yourself to be.
I know the law with regard to photogrpahy, but please give me your interpretation of it.
8 June, 2012 at 9:15 pm #498514@terry wrote:
@tinks wrote:
@terry wrote:
@tinks wrote:
the photo’s still up then? :roll:
:-s
[-o< Give me strength…
say what you want but after a few phone calls made ……you are definately walking on dodgey ground……..at the very least the children’s faces should be blurred out……….you are not above the law Terry whatever you believe yourself to be.
I know the law with regard to photogrpahy, but please give me your interpretation of it.
I work in school and I am totally aware of parental permissions that have to be sought to display pictures of children on the net ………terry at the end of the day you can post pics like that as often as you like on whatever sites you like………..but if I was a parent of one of those children I would be seeking legal advice about what you have done ………you should delete that pic.
8 June, 2012 at 9:22 pm #498515@tinks wrote:
@terry wrote:
@tinks wrote:
@terry wrote:
@tinks wrote:
the photo’s still up then? :roll:
:-s
[-o< Give me strength…
say what you want but after a few phone calls made ……you are definately walking on dodgey ground……..at the very least the children’s faces should be blurred out……….you are not above the law Terry whatever you believe yourself to be.
I know the law with regard to photogrpahy, but please give me your interpretation of it.
I work in school and I am totally aware of parental permissions that have to be sought to display pictures of children on the net ………terry at the end of the day you can post pics like that as often as you like on whatever sites you like………..but if I was a parent of one of those children I would be seeking legal advice about what you have done ………you should delete that pic.
Legal advice on what grounds..?
8 June, 2012 at 9:32 pm #498516@terry wrote:
@tinks wrote:
@terry wrote:
@tinks wrote:
@terry wrote:
@tinks wrote:
the photo’s still up then? :roll:
:-s
[-o< Give me strength…
say what you want but after a few phone calls made ……you are definately walking on dodgey ground……..at the very least the children’s faces should be blurred out……….you are not above the law Terry whatever you believe yourself to be.
I know the law with regard to photogrpahy, but please give me your interpretation of it.
I work in school and I am totally aware of parental permissions that have to be sought to display pictures of children on the net ………terry at the end of the day you can post pics like that as often as you like on whatever sites you like………..but if I was a parent of one of those children I would be seeking legal advice about what you have done ………you should delete that pic.
Legal advice on what grounds..?
On the grounds that you don’t have consent to post their child’s picture
If you have parental consent for every child in that photo to post their pic on this site then its not a problem………but i very much doubt you do ……….no one should post pictures of children on the net because they ‘can’ whether they are a photographer or not………to be quite honest you appear to be goading me and i’m not up for that……….end of thread for me terry.
8 June, 2012 at 10:01 pm #498517@tinks wrote:
@terry wrote:
@tinks wrote:
@terry wrote:
@tinks wrote:
@terry wrote:
@tinks wrote:
the photo’s still up then? :roll:
:-s
[-o< Give me strength…
say what you want but after a few phone calls made ……you are definately walking on dodgey ground……..at the very least the children’s faces should be blurred out……….you are not above the law Terry whatever you believe yourself to be.
I know the law with regard to photogrpahy, but please give me your interpretation of it.
I work in school and I am totally aware of parental permissions that have to be sought to display pictures of children on the net ………terry at the end of the day you can post pics like that as often as you like on whatever sites you like………..but if I was a parent of one of those children I would be seeking legal advice about what you have done ………you should delete that pic.
Legal advice on what grounds..?
On the grounds that you don’t have consent to post their child’s picture
If you have parental consent for every child in that photo to post their pic on this site then its not a problem………but i very much doubt you do ……….no one should post pictures of children on the net because they ‘can’ whether they are a photographer or not………to be quite honest you appear to be goading me and i’m not up for that……….end of thread for me terry.
I’m not goading you,
but you’re confusing law with political correctness.
8 June, 2012 at 11:08 pm #498518I think this is a great debate, but we’re getting distracted by the argument over the inclusion of a press photograph.
Therefore, I’ve edited the opening post with a link to the article on the Daily Mail website rather than having the photo in question embedded in the opening post.
PS – I want to thank everyone for remaining civil and constructive in this thread. It’s been a great read up to now; long may that continue.
8 June, 2012 at 11:23 pm #498519@chathostuk wrote:
I think this is a great debate, but we’re getting distracted by the argument over the inclusion of a press photograph.
Therefore, I’ve edited the opening post with a link to the article on the Daily Mail website rather than having the photo in question embedded in the opening post.
PS – I want to thank everyone for remaining civil and constructive in this thread. It’s been a great read up to now; long may that continue.
Excellent! Thanks, Martin!
@chathostuk wrote:
Therefore, I’ve edited the opening post with a link to the article on the Daily Mail website rather than having the photo in question embedded in the opening post.
Proof Terry reads the Daily Mail!
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!