-
Posts
-
@forumhostpb wrote:
@r.O.T.T wrote:
not hard to work out anita is PB
That will come as something of a surprise to our long time user – the infamous Throb.
For the record and since R.O.T.T. (aka Dagger) has seen fit to raise this disgusting picture.after all traces of it have been deleted….his first PM to me said – and I quote “You’re a coward and a shit”…. just that and nothing else.
This was followed by more abusive PM’s.
By contrast, the several other users that also PM’d me about the unacceptable picture (and attached comments) made the point that they felt it was disgusting and that I deleted it. I entirely agree with them and told them all so individually.
The picture WAS deleted within moments of my signing in and so also were the posts that referred to it or worse still quoted it so that it appeared yet again.
i called you a coward and a sh it because you only deleted all traces of ubers paedophile comments. i asked for the post to be locked you wouldnt lock it with the evidence of ubers paedophile comments.
For that i call you a coward and a sh itUber it wasnt the picture that was the issue here, as you are fully aware. It was your disgusting remarks that you made about it that made everyone see you for the pathetic excuse for a human being that you are
And actually PB you didnt even come close (can I say that? :shock: ) to getting rid of all traces of it, firstly isnt this thread a “trace”? And secondly the actual “soooooo offensive pic” is the one quite plainly shown at the end of bats link on her earlier post on the same thread, a link that is also re shown several times as that post is then quoted so out of curiosity how is the actual pic itself, if so disgusting so much worse than a link to the exact same photo on the exact same thread?
Not critcising or complaining about the deletion itself here you understand, as being no more than a satirical poke at the critiques of and exampled of “wild speculating” on the topic its an irrelevance anyhoo (albeit IMO obviously a funny irrelevance)
But merely picking up on the photo being described as “disgusting” when I am sure sky would beg to differ, when infact it was the comedic “wild speculation” people had an issue with, even tho the exact same suggestion of a possibility has been posted several times on the topic without such an outcry
But add a publicly (on the world wide media) displayed photo to a far less serious comment and its somehow “more”
@ubermik wrote:
Its been removed? :o :o
Oh well, that’ll teach me to download pics from disreputeable sites like Skynews.com I guess :lol:
Yes Ubermik it has been deleted from the Boards ….. and quite rightly too.
For the record, and so that everybody is aware, posting that picture with the utterly unacceptable comments underneath it has provoked a substantial number of users to express their utter disgust and revulsion both in public and by PM to me in private. I have alsoi received several e-mails bringing your post to my attention.
Also for the record, I share that revulsion and disgust. I really thought better of you and I am appalled that you should think that posting that sort of stuff is in any way acceptable to a decent right minded person.
You are publicly warned that if you EVER do anything like this again on these message Boards your account will be permanently deleted.
See…. he does care. I knew that all along. :wink:
Lets leave it now, no point going on about it is there.
he’s laughing at you and you profer a yellow card
how low does he have to sink for you to react
PB you said you have lost respect for me
ditto@r.O.T.T wrote:
he’s laughing at you and you profer a yellow card
how low does he have to sink for you to react
PB you said you have lost respect for me
dittoWell i think you deserve a red card for saying im PB! :twisted:
@r.O.T.T wrote:
@forumhostpb wrote:
@r.O.T.T wrote:
not hard to work out anita is PB
That will come as something of a surprise to our long time user – the infamous Throb.
For the record and since R.O.T.T. (aka Dagger) has seen fit to raise this disgusting picture.after all traces of it have been deleted….his first PM to me said – and I quote “You’re a coward and a shit”…. just that and nothing else.
This was followed by more abusive PM’s.
By contrast, the several other users that also PM’d me about the unacceptable picture (and attached comments) made the point that they felt it was disgusting and that I deleted it. I entirely agree with them and told them all so individually.
The picture WAS deleted within moments of my signing in and so also were the posts that referred to it or worse still quoted it so that it appeared yet again.
i called you a coward and a sh it because you only deleted all traces of ubers paedophile comments. i asked for the post to be locked you wouldnt lock it with the evidence of ubers paedophile comments.
For that i call you a coward and a sh itPMSL @ “paedophile comments” and the award for the furthest stretching of the realms of reality goes too,,,,,,,drum roll,,,,,,,ROTT
Get a grip lol
Had the photo been of a 21 year old I am sure many people would have had the same thought of what it “looked like”, and although many would be socially pussy whipped into never vocalising it would, as it wouldnt look any different have thought the same thing here
Had in the photo she looked tall, muddy, sleepy or anything else would that also be a “paedo” comment then purely because its a direct observation of a photo of a child?
Jeez, talk about scraping the bottom of the barrel for a dig lol
i saw the pic breifly……..declined to comment. :evil:
@ubermik wrote:
@r.O.T.T wrote:
@forumhostpb wrote:
@r.O.T.T wrote:
not hard to work out anita is PB
That will come as something of a surprise to our long time user – the infamous Throb.
For the record and since R.O.T.T. (aka Dagger) has seen fit to raise this disgusting picture.after all traces of it have been deleted….his first PM to me said – and I quote “You’re a coward and a shit”…. just that and nothing else.
This was followed by more abusive PM’s.
By contrast, the several other users that also PM’d me about the unacceptable picture (and attached comments) made the point that they felt it was disgusting and that I deleted it. I entirely agree with them and told them all so individually.
The picture WAS deleted within moments of my signing in and so also were the posts that referred to it or worse still quoted it so that it appeared yet again.
i called you a coward and a sh it because you only deleted all traces of ubers paedophile comments. i asked for the post to be locked you wouldnt lock it with the evidence of ubers paedophile comments.
For that i call you a coward and a sh itPMSL @ “paedophile comments” and the award for the furthest stretching of the realms of reality goes too,,,,,,,drum roll,,,,,,,ROTT
Get a grip lol
Had the photo been of a 21 year old I am sure many people would have had the same thought of what it “looked like”, and although many would be socially little furry cat whipped into never vocalising it would, as it wouldnt look any different have thought the same thing here
Had in the photo she looked tall, muddy, sleepy or anything else would that also be a “paedo” comment then purely because its a direct observation of a photo of a child?
Jeez, talk about scraping the bottom of the barrel for a dig lol
it was a photo of madeline with ice cream on her lips and you suggested it could of being her fathers sperm
The topic ‘a photo………….’ is closed to new replies.