-
Posts
-
SHAR, I was hoping that you’d gone, er thought you’d gone. You had pwomised you were going.
Were you taught your arithmetic by cosy aka Karl???
More importantly, are you teachng arithmetic to kids today, because if so no wonder that Brits can’t do the basic jobs. One solution to the immigration crisis could be to stop teaching math and get someone in who knows what they be doing.
Read the initial post again, squire! If you don’t understand it, then end your job as cosy’s teaching assistant asap.
I don’t require your permission to change my mind, chump. While you swagger round this site ‘vetting’ all the comments, giving the seal of approval and patting those on the head you agree with and snarling aggressively at those you don’t.
A real man would have admitted his schoolboy error, confusing the actual amount we pay, with the amount we get back. Then you attempt to bluff your way out of it so you don’t lose “face”.
Let me explain it to you again. More slowly this time.
The UK pays the EU 23 million pounds a day, Net, (2015) 161 million a week, 161 million does NOT come back as you quite clearly state.
Based on Gross, 350 million could theoretically be paid into the NHS.
Chump.
Oh Gawdd….it’s like trying to explain a simple joke to someone who keeps asking what do you mean?
Listen, put your thinking cap on and concentrate, hard as it may be..
as cosy’s teaching assistant in math. you may get £900 a week (I don’t know the going rate). £900 is gross wage.
£300 is taken off you in tax, so
you actually get £600 a week. £600 is net wage.
Follow so far???
This means that when you go to booze your woes away on the weekend you have £600 max to spend on your Vimto. You do not have £900 to spend. Your £900 is just gross, the £600 is net. You only have £600 to spend, or SHAR is a boy who is in trouble with his mum or the bank.
Get it???
£350 million is paid gross; but really £161 million net. This means that as Treasury adviser to the Brexit campaign, you really should know that you don’t have £350 million to spend on the NHS or anything – just £161 million. Let’s leave it there, or you’ll get really angry and start blaming neo-liberals for confusing you, where the real culprit is our educational system.
You do know the difference between net and gross now- right? Please inform your Brexit friends, though my strong guess is that they are liars, not buffoons.
Gawd, did his mother not teach him to count his money before he went shopping for her?
Sheesh!!
Oh Gawdd….it’s like trying to explain a simple joke to someone who keeps asking what do you mean?
Listen, put your thinking cap on and concentrate, hard as it may be..
as cosy’s teaching assistant in math. you may get £900 a week (I don’t know the going rate). £900 is gross wage.
£300 is taken off you in tax, so
you actually get £600 a week. £600 is net wage.
Follow so far???
This means that when you go to booze your woes away on the weekend you have £600 max to spend on your Vimto. You do not have £900 to spend. Your £900 is just gross, the £600 is net. You only have £600 to spend, or SHAR is a boy who is in trouble with his mum or the bank.
Get it???
£350 million is paid gross; but really £161 million net. This means that as Treasury adviser to the Brexit campaign, you really should know that you don’t have £350 million to spend on the NHS or anything – just £161 million. Let’s leave it there, or you’ll get really angry and start blaming neo-liberals for confusing you, where the real culprit is our educational system.
You do know the difference between net and gross now- right? Please inform your Brexit friends, though my strong guess is that they are liars, not buffoons.
Gawd, did his mother not teach him to count his money before he went shopping for her?
Sheesh!!
More whataboutery from the economically illiterate chump, who is not man enough, to man up to his initial school boy error. Now he is attempting, poorly, to use my own argument as if he thought of it himself.
Someone explain to chump, that if tax is taken out of the equation then Gross determines the actual amount, not in fact Net. Leaving the EU produces a Gross figure because “tax” is removed. The tax being what we pay the EU. As I stated. Therefore theoretically 350 million could be paid into the NHS.
Brexit took that figure from the ONS site, who base their conclusions on statistics from the UK treasury. Only chump could know more than both the UK treasury and the ONS.
Btw chump it would take a lot more than a snarling pitbull like you, to make me angry.
you really are a genuine fool, SHAR.
Go back to school!!!
If anyone else is as daft as he is, please don’t add. If I tried to explain it any more simply, he’d get the wrong end of the stick.
I bet he actually is the Treasury adviser to UKIP and teaching assistant to cosy lol
Now pensions are gonna suffer, what next we’ll all have a leg drop off and become blind in one eye, the world will spin the other way, i wish both sides would fuck off with the negativity
Pete,
Cameron is desperate. If he loses this referendum, I can’t see how he’s going to survive, and his name may go down in history books as a PM who combines the silliness to have a referendum on a complicated trading market with the ability to lose and push the UK into problems which may, may be catastrophic.
If you read what he says, he’s right, though. If the economy is smaller, then the pot of money to pay basic services is also going to be smaller, and he won’t be able to guarantee the ‘triple’ lock which maintains the standard of living for pensioners, or the NHS etc.
So , most importantly – is he right on that happening?
Simple answwer is yes but only if the UK is left in a desolate situation of isolation, paying high tariffs to the Single Market and open to dumping from every other country with a problem.
And he’s right if the EU breaks up – a definite possibility if the UK leaves – and if that happens, God help everybody everywhere.
So – I look to the Brexiteers for what they propose as the new trading arrangements. Someone counted 23 proposals for an alternative – some of them fantasy. Which one are they putting forward??
Answers, please. It’s easy peasy to be negative, as you say, but they should be putting forward a realistic alternative and answering questions about that alternative sensibly. This is too serious for the politicking that you’ve noticed.
you really are a genuine fool, SHAR.
Go back to school!!!
If anyone else is as daft as he is, please don’t add. If I tried to explain it any more simply, he’d get the wrong end of the stick.
I bet he actually is the Treasury adviser to UKIP and teaching assistant to cosy lol
The idiot who can’t spell my user name… Ironic.
Trundle on you domineering, argumentative oaf. Always got to have the last word. Destroyed by a girl. Go and patronize the other female posters, while you”invite” them to give an opinion.
Now pensions are gonna suffer, what next we’ll all have a leg drop off and become blind in one eye, the world will spin the other way, i wish both sides would fuck off with the negativity
Pete,
Cameron is desperate. If he loses this referendum, I can’t see how he’s going to survive, and his name may go down in history books as a PM who combines the silliness to have a referendum on a complicated trading market with the ability to lose and push the UK into problems which may, may be catastrophic.
If you read what he says, he’s right, though. If the economy is smaller, then the pot of money to pay basic services is also going to be smaller, and he won’t be able to guarantee the ‘triple’ lock which maintains the standard of living for pensioners, or the NHS etc.
So , most importantly – is he right on that happening?
Simple answwer is yes but only if the UK is left in a desolate situation of isolation, paying high tariffs to the Single Market and open to dumping from every other country with a problem.
And he’s right if the EU breaks up – a definite possibility if the UK leaves – and if that happens, God help everybody everywhere.
So – I look to the Brexiteers for what they propose as the new trading arrangements. Someone counted 23 proposals for an alternative – some of them fantasy. Which one are they putting forward??
Answers, please. It’s easy peasy to be negative, as you say, but they should be putting forward a realistic alternative and answering questions about that alternative sensibly. This is too serious for the politicking that you’ve noticed.
We are major importers why would they place high tariffs on us when we could do exactly the same to them, third highest importers from Germany, they’re not going to want to lose that.
It smacks to me of threatening the lowest paid people as they are the ones most likely to vote out.
There hasn’t always been an EU the world survived before it would survive after, and at least we wouldn’t have to bail out Greece Ireland Spain Italy and every bloody eastern European country that is now applying to join.
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!