-
Posts
-
During the IRA campaigns, an Irish friend of mine was arrested at Heathrow and then detained…I think for about two weeks. The reason? He had the same name as a suspect the police were looking for. Of course he was never charged, but the impact on his family and friends and indeed, his terrified self, was monumental at the time.
The need for 42 days is as erroneous as the need for the Iraq war. We are close to becoming a country with so few civil liberties that it’s not only frigtening but shameful.
Quite frankly, Labour winning that vote makes my blood boil.@forumhostpb wrote:
Word on the street is that he’ll get blown out in the House of Lords so it’s all a bit of a farce inn’t it?
I hope they don’t televise it.
@kezef wrote:
New to the board and curious as to the lay of the land, so I’ll start with a quickie and see if I get a response. Forty two days to hold terror suspects without charge. Yes or no?
yes.. then put a bullet in their brainwashed evil heads.
emmalush has been saying for as long as i anremember, that these ever more terror laws are only designed to enslave the average man. they wave the terror flag, then use cctv cameras to ensnare joe public for choosing the wrong school so his child can get a better education whilst not having the money to pay for a hiked up house price area.welcome to he big brother society that is creeping ever closer to you.
But her chosen vote would see all blacks and Asians shipped home, thats democratic innit?
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!