Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › 13-yr-old gets three-year detention for rape
-
AuthorPosts
-
27 January, 2010 at 10:32 pm #429710
sorry abt my essays i’ll shush now lol
27 January, 2010 at 10:34 pm #429711@gazlan wrote:
But it prevents that person doing it again and saves some £40000 a yr of tax payers money
Well slappa ma thigh…………..and just where will that money go…or rather to who will it go……. :roll:
And why do we have 3 strengths of cheddar cheese (which is as relevant as your statement) What does it matter where the £40000 goes it serves no purpose keeping the Peter Sutcliffes and Myra Hindley’s of this world alive
27 January, 2010 at 10:45 pm #429712There have been some good opinions expressed on this thread. When I read the newspaper today, my initial thoughts were (expecially on the back of the Doncaster boys) that may be should should re-open remand homes and borstals. They were closed down because they ran on corporal punishment and fear. They did scar young men, but they also saved a fair few. But I do not think that would solve the problems we seem to have with our society.
I read something today… it said…. follow the three R’s:
Respect for yourself
Respect for others
Responsibility for your own actionsEmpathy and the ability to put yourself in someone else’s shoes is something you would hope everyone is born with. Yet psychopaths cannot feel empathy .. and they do not have a social conscience but live out their lives with themselves at the centre of their universe. Are these children social psycopaths? If they are, then some of them will have been born with that tendency and some may have become that way through a childhood that destroyed them.
In all three cases that have been in the papers this week, of children who have behaved in the most evil way imaginable, all of them have lost their childhoods. And it is society as a whole that is to blame. You cannot purely blame the social services for having failed them, although they did, and you cannot purely blame the parents, although they too played their part. The reason they did what they did is probably because they were not thinking of the consequences, and because the people that were their victims were not real people to them.
It is very very sad, and something needs to be done, but it has been a long time since Jamie Bulger and yet things of this nature are still happening. Do we need more social services, more community policing? Do we need to give parenting classes to people who are struggling? Do we take children away from alcoholics and drug users? What is the answer?
27 January, 2010 at 10:54 pm #429713Did they do any of that the last generation our parents generation where it seemed to be “spare the rod spoil the child”. Perhaps it was the same just reporting is “better” There seems to be a lack of respect nowadays which wasn’t there when i was a child, perhaps if we went back to a bit of old fashioned values and policing
27 January, 2010 at 11:35 pm #429714I read something today… it said…. follow the three R’s:
Respect for yourself
Respect for others
Responsibility for your own actionsLead by example ???????
And why do we have 3 strengths of cheddar cheese (which is as relevant as your statement) What does it matter where the £40000 goes it serves no purpose keeping the Peter Sutcliffes and Myra Hindley’s of this world alive
Great……..lets put a capital figure on it…….and…deprive any loved ones of these criminals any chance of being cured of their disabiltiy…… your capitalist views mean absolutley NOTHING in terms of saving this country fast disappearing down the sh~tta…….. NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!
27 January, 2010 at 11:37 pm #429715sorry abt my essays i’ll shush now lol
I mock………dont do that :wink:
27 January, 2010 at 11:41 pm #429716You cant cure Peter Sutcliffe ffs
27 January, 2010 at 11:43 pm #429717Yes doctor………thank you doctor :roll:
27 January, 2010 at 11:46 pm #429718If thats what drugs do for you then i’m glad i dont take them. Anyone who thinks Peter Sutcliffe could EVER be released is either an idiot or as high as a kite.
You’re not Lord Longford in disguise are you27 January, 2010 at 11:48 pm #429719Ill leave that for you to decide……..you appear to know all else……..doctor
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!