-
Posts
-
Just watching a new film called “we own the night” when i noticed a few suspect things.
Number 1
The twin towers still standing
Number 2Rio Ferdinand is wanted by NYPD :shock:
:lol: how old is it?
New film, pretty sure its still on the cinema.
Ive not heard of it. Perhaps its based in a time when the twin towers were still around? I cannot see any other reason for them being there. The yanks are quite sensetive about that sort of thing arent they.
Im not sure about Rio though…. why would the Yanks want him when all he has committed are crimes against football… would hardly be top of their wanted list lol!!
It might be based on a earlier time, i did have pop to the fridge for a re-inforcement of beers so maybe they said a date :oops: .
But no mistaking rio ferdinand tho :lol:
http://uk.movies.yahoo.com/w/We-Own-The-Night/index-4280697.html
14th December it came out, and i see with the story plot they say its based in the 80’s :oops:
would have thought the up to day IT equipment would have given it away
@matty wrote:
would have thought the up to day IT equipment would have given it away
lol never took that much notice :oops:The film was released on 14th December 2007. However, because it was shot in New York (amongst other US places) instead of Toronto, it took much longer to make.
The fact is that many films are made and then sit on the shelf – sometimes for several years – awaiting a release date. We all think that a film is made and then released shortly afterwards. Not so.
Mind you it sure seems a poor bit of ‘continuity’ to allow obsolete background to remain in the film when a swift bit of digital editing could have resolved the matter.
@forumhostpb wrote:
The film was released on 14th December 2007. However, because it was shot in New York (amongst other US places) instead of Toronto, it took much longer to make.
The fact is that many films are made and then sit on the shelf – sometimes for several years – awaiting a release date. We all think that a film is made and then released shortly afterwards. Not so.
Mind you it sure seems a poor bit of ‘continuity’ to allow obsolete background to remain in the film when a swift bit of digital editing could have resolved the matter.
erm…. did the preceding posts not happen? I feel like I entered a time warp
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!