Boards Index › General discussion › Off topic chat › Does Sky Have an Inferiority complex?
-
AuthorPosts
-
19 January, 2008 at 9:09 pm #9050
Being a newbee i don’t quite understand the Sky character.I’ve noticed the person always seems to be trying to cause conflict with what can be best described as juvenile attitude.
Have i indeed fallen in the trap of boasting this characters inflated ego?
I f SKY is indeed as good looking as claimed, why does the character not show a true picture of what they look like?? :?:19 January, 2008 at 9:36 pm #305234cos she as about a zillion user names an no life.
20 January, 2008 at 12:13 am #305235yeaaaaaaaah!!
20 January, 2008 at 12:21 am #30523620 January, 2008 at 12:23 am #305237@colkaz wrote:
Being a newbee i don’t quite understand the Sky character.I’ve noticed the person always seems to be trying to cause conflict with what can be best described as juvenile attitude.
Have i indeed fallen in the trap of boasting this characters inflated ego?
I f SKY is indeed as good looking as claimed, why does the character not show a true picture of what they look like?? :?:Forgive me if i am wrong but I never boasted in being good looking, not as this character anyway – and you werent here then anyway so how would you know?
What trap have you fallen into? I have never spoken to or about you before? In fact this is first time I have saw your name on a thread and btw are you sure your a newbie as you sound too upfront to be one. Your attitude and typing are familiar.20 January, 2008 at 12:25 am #305238I don’t think so.
They got Andy Gray and all that tech wizardry but I’m loyal to the Beeb.
If they got rid of Lineker then that would be ace, he was a better footballer than he is a presenter. Lawrenson of course too, but then thats a given.
20 January, 2008 at 12:27 am #305239@toybulldog wrote:
I don’t think so.
They got Andy Gray and all that tech wizardry but I’m loyal to the Beeb.
If they got rid of Lineker then that would be ace, he was a better footballer than he is a presenter. Lawrenson of course too, but then thats a given.
fucing class. you wierdo.
20 January, 2008 at 12:30 am #305240@sharongooner wrote:
@toybulldog wrote:
I don’t think so.
They got Andy Gray and all that tech wizardry but I’m loyal to the Beeb.
If they got rid of Lineker then that would be ace, he was a better footballer than he is a presenter. Lawrenson of course too, but then thats a given.
fucing class. you wierdo.
yeah.. Im too pi**ed to say anyfing else.. but I agree!!!!!!!!!!! lol!!
20 January, 2008 at 12:38 am #305241@prettypink wrote:
@sharongooner wrote:
@toybulldog wrote:
I don’t think so.
They got Andy Gray and all that tech wizardry but I’m loyal to the Beeb.
If they got rid of Lineker then that would be ace, he was a better footballer than he is a presenter. Lawrenson of course too, but then thats a given.
fucing class. you wierdo.
yeah.. Im too pi**ed to say anyfing else.. but I agree!!!!!!!!!!! lol!!
Now I’m blushing with pride yet feel all insulted at the same time. Wot a happysad position to be in that is.
Anyway at least I’m not sleeping wiv the Director-General like Mark Lawro is.
20 January, 2008 at 12:40 am #305242@toybulldog wrote:
@prettypink wrote:
@sharongooner wrote:
@toybulldog wrote:
I don’t think so.
They got Andy Gray and all that tech wizardry but I’m loyal to the Beeb.
If they got rid of Lineker then that would be ace, he was a better footballer than he is a presenter. Lawrenson of course too, but then thats a given.
fucing class. you wierdo.
yeah.. Im too pi**ed to say anyfing else.. but I agree!!!!!!!!!!! lol!!
Now I’m blushing with pride yet feel all insulted at the same time. Wot a happysad position to be in that is.
Anyway at least I’m not sleeping wiv the Director-General like Mark Lawro is.
yeaaah!! sorry im outa here now.. Nite..x
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!