-
Posts
-
What is not to believe?
The only reason people would be mad about it is the fact that it’s still fresh in the mind of people and that it has not been solved.
It would not be the first time this kind of sad and tragic type of event would be made into a movie, 911 is a fine example, and plenty of murders in the past, so to be blunt, why should anyone be outraged by this? If this movie was made in 10 years time i doubt anyone would batter an eye lid.
Bad choice of words – “What would really help is for the arguido status to be lifted and then a wave of sympathy would lead to more money coming in.” Says it all really!
– Dawn, England
says it all really.
Anything they do, to raise money, to keep searching for the child they let down so innocently, albeit stupidly, is fine by me.
Although I, for one, wouldn’t want to see the movie; I’m sure there are plenty who will.I found this part of the report quite enlightening:
@The McCann’s expensive publicity team wrote:
The meeting tomorrow follows the resignation of key board members, including the fund’s spokeswoman Esther McVey.
The fund agreed a deal in the autumn to pay the Barcelona-based agency Metodo 3 a retainer of £50,000 a month for six months to find Madeleine. Metodo 3 has come in for criticism over comments made by its boss Francisco Marco, including one that he knew who kidnapped Madeleine and a promise to find her by Christmas.
The fund has also been criticised for paying two months’ worth of mortgage payments, amounting to a few thousand pounds, on the McCanns’ home while they were in Portugal and unable to work.
The plain fact is that desite absolutely enormous amounts of money being spent and vast amounts of international publicity ….. nothing …. absolutely nothing at all has been seen or heard of little Maddie McCann.
I am still of the opinion that she was killed and that her parent’s are quite rightly the ”prime suspects”.
Call me old fashioned – but if it walks like a duck …. and quacks like a duck …. chances are that it IS a duck.
@nanny ogg wrote:
Anything they do, to raise money, to keep searching for the child they let down so innocently, albeit stupidly, is fine by me.
Although I, for one, wouldn’t want to see the movie; I’m sure there are plenty who will.I agree.
If they want to keep the search going, they’ve gotta find new ways to raise the revenue to do so.
This has dragged on for way too long already, it needs someone to get a strangle hold on the situation and stop p.ussy footing about, i don’t know all the facts of the case, but havent the parents only been interviewed once?
It seems there is almost a air of being untouchable surrounding them, at this rate i dont see it ever being resolved or anyone being held accountable for whatever has happened.
Agree with that ^^ it will never be resolved. The mystery will only be enhanced by that.
@anita Gofradump wrote:
This has dragged on for way too long already, it needs someone to get a strangle hold on the situation and stop p.ussy footing about, i don’t know all the facts of the case, but havent the parents only been interviewed once?
It seems there is almost a air of being untouchable surrounding them, at this rate i dont see it ever being resolved or anyone being held accountable for whatever has happened.
The Police cant just keep pulling the Parents (or anyone else) in to get interviewed without any evidence or proof. There is no evidence or proof.
True BM … but that is exactly the point of ”pulling people in” for questioning isn’t it?
You start with maybe a suspicion, or maybe something about a suspect’s story that doesn’t quite add up, and then you ask lots of questions …. looking for discrepancies – hoping that the suspect will give contradictory accounts of the events. If you find some you explore them until the ”story” splits wide open.
Loads of times cases are successfully prosecuted where the only evidence is the suspect’s own statements.
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!