Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › Mick Biffin turns in his grave
-
AuthorPosts
-
20 December, 2007 at 11:55 am #8755
Who remembers the ballerina Simone Clarke? She’s a dancer with the English National Ballet and was outed as a member of the BNP a while ago by those nasty Media types.
Well it seems that Richard Barnbrook – leader of the Barking (mad) and Dagenham (girl pipers) BNP group – not only remembers her, but he has also proposed marriage to her as well.
Awwwwww how nice – a Spring wedding perhaps??? (just in time to the beginning of the race to be London’s mayor – and Dickie is the BNP candidate).
Simone has parted from her long time partner Yat-Seng Chang who is an immigrant of mixed Chinese / Cuban descent and they have a child called Olivia.
Now here’s the thing. Originally Dickie Barnbrook is on the record as saying that he wasn’t opposed to mixed marriages as such, but their children washout “the identity of this country’s indigenous people”.
However, he changed his tune yesterday. He said “It doesn’t bother me at all about Olivia. When we get married that child will be my child”.
Mick Biffin and BNP party HQ must be turning in their graves.
20 December, 2007 at 9:39 pm #295949Heres 3 GREAT reasons why this story is, well, GREAT.
1. PB used to claim that Richard The Great Barnbrook was gay.
2. If a leading BNPer says he now doesn’t mind mixed colour people, then he isn’t “racist”.
3. Isn’t it GREAT that people who belong to a political organisation can have INDIVIDUAL beliefs without the party whip thrown at them.
Well done PB, you’ve shown that The Great describes both Richard and the BNP.
Richard The Great Barnbrook is an upstanding member of our society, prepared to take on another man’s child as his own and look after her.
Richard The Great Barnbrook :)
20 December, 2007 at 11:17 pm #295950BACK O THE NET EMMA…… YOU GO GIRL.HA HA HA HA MADE MY DRUNKEN NITE THAT ONE LASS. :lol: :lol: :lol:
21 December, 2007 at 12:50 am #295951@emmalush wrote:
2. If a leading BNPer says he now doesn’t mind mixed colour people, then he isn’t “racist”.
also means he isnt a real BNP member unless he il willing to have his own child kicked out of the country or as the BNP politely put it
“invited to leave”
21 December, 2007 at 12:00 pm #295952if you read the bnp manifesto it says people who want to take VOLUNTARY repatriation they will be supported with grants both for they, and their family members. but to the country of repatriation also will be given grants to help their communities accepting repatriation. it doesnt say anywhere that repatriation would be forced.
the government at the moment is paying foreign people to return home with grants of £4.000 which, while seeming costly actually saves us, the tax payer money. so is the labour government racist as well ?
also the lib dems have drafted a similar alternative to repatriate immigrants who fail their applications for assylum. are thet racist too ?
and in labours defence they have recently changed the law so families of foreign visitors will have to pay a security bond of £1.000 per visitor, to ensure their visitors return home when their visit is over.
foreign offenders who are jailed for over a year will automatically be deported.
this seems a good move forward to me and i dont consider gordon brown a racist. do you ?
it seems to me that certain people wil attack anyone who does not comply with the liberal left commie cronies. you can have an opinion thet doesnt agree. without being a racist but some folk dont think you should be allowed to air that opinion, free speach and the ability to use it is what we fought wars for. and no matter what vile opinion or how cruel the belief we have to allow all people that rite without slagging them off on a personal note..21 December, 2007 at 3:16 pm #295953waspish, can you translate that into a foreign language so Token can understand it :wink:
21 December, 2007 at 6:15 pm #295954Im still coming to the terms with the fact Mick Biffen is dead! :shock:
21 December, 2007 at 7:33 pm #295955@waspish wrote:
if you read the bnp manifesto it says people who want to take VOLUNTARY repatriation they will be supported with grants both for they, and their family members. but to the country of repatriation also will be given grants to help their communities accepting repatriation. it doesnt say anywhere that repatriation would be forced.
the government at the moment is paying foreign people to return home with grants of £4.000 which, while seeming costly actually saves us, the tax payer money. so is the labour government racist as well ?
also the lib dems have drafted a similar alternative to repatriate immigrants who fail their applications for assylum. are thet racist too ?Wasp- don’t you think there’s a difference between someone who arrived from Somalia last week and someone who is as British as you or me but happens to have had his great grandparents born in Jamaica but had his granparents and parents born in this country and are British- after all how many people here have Irish ancestry
The issue though is the fact that the BNP even has as its policy the VOLUNTARY repatriation of anyone who is British PURELY on the colour of their skin- it does not state it will voluntarily repatriate children who were born to American GI fathers (providing of course they are white) nor 3rd or 4th generation Rhodeisans, Australians, Kiwis, Canadians, White South Africans or ANY white european nationality- ONLY non white non european britons- THATS WHY ITS DEEMED RACIST- VOLUNTARY OR OTHERWISE
It is a direct insult to every non white Briton who deems this country to be the best in the world and are proud to be British
22 December, 2007 at 1:43 am #295956Slavery, whats wrong with a white britain?
22 December, 2007 at 1:47 am #295957emma are you the little britain character who vomits over things when shes told they were made by black, chinese etc? lmaooo :lol:
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!