Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 14 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #7842

    Bat

    Are parents who don,t give their kids the MMR jab selfish or not?
    MMR

    #285414

    My son wanted MMR when he was about 5 but we decided against it

    We thought that as he tended to break his toys quite quickly and lose parts off them that it wouldnt really be a wise choice to let him have an MMR

    Instead we pursuaded him to have a fairly large remote control car about the size of a shoe box which was quite sturdily built and would be less likely to be left lying around, trodden on and smashed as would have been VERY likely with a teensy weensy Mega Midget Racer :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

    #285415

    Seriously tho, the article seems a bit vague really

    Firstly it doesnt say when this “year” they talk about starts and ends, we could be one week into it or we could be eleven months through it which would massively alter the seriousness of the scare mongering

    They also I noticed seem to skip past the quite possible reason for such a jump, oddly enough the exact same reason we have also over the last 10 years had massive curve breaking jumps in diseases like measles, mumps, small pox, chicken pox, Hepatitis B and C, Aids and HIV. Because immigrants are allowed to come here without any medical screening from countries with either no vaccination policies and no decent health care system and then show up on our figures as tho theres been some change in OUR practices

    But if you want to REALLY see some scary NHS proposals then swing a look at their plans to make HIV/AIDs tests compulsory for pregnant women, then look at the fact that all of the HIV tests are flawed and false positives run at about 50-60 % even on normal healthy people BUT shoot up to as high as 80-90% with pregnant women and pretty much anyone who has had a blood transfusion or taken any form of antibiotics

    And then cast a glance at the treatments they will, if found to test positive (which 80-90% of the time will be incorect) HAVE to take and see what the deformity and foetal mortality rates are when taking those treatments which again run at about 80-90% with some of them

    Infact one of the common drugs used for treatment is AZT, which was and still is banned from even being given to livestock, but for some strange and inexplicable reason is commonly given to diagnosed HIV or AIDs sufferers. but because of the type of drug it is has an almost total chance of negatively affecting the development of a foetus as it rearranges DNA and RNA base pair sequences which is about the worst thing that can happen to a growing developing baby as they are still being used to actually form its biomatter into a human being

    And yet both the US and the UK are planning to force the tests and treatment which could have massive and decimating outcomes for pregnant women if introduced

    and then you will have a real and actual travesty rather than a mere theorised and possibly exagerated one to worry about :)

    #285416

    @sweetass wrote:

    Being an ex nurse I can tell you they’ve been doing random HIV tests on pregnant women for atleast 13 years now .. whats scary about that is, they no some women have the HIV virus .. but they don’t know who it is and therefore have been unable to inform the affected women … usually these women were unaware of their status

    … how many more people have been infected because of this :?:

    ….. and the answer to your question is ………… ????????????

    #285417

    Not selfish if Harold Shipman was your doctor.

    #285418

    @sweetass wrote:

    @ubermik wrote:

    Seriously tho, the article seems a bit vague really

    Firstly it doesnt say when this “year” they talk about starts and ends, we could be one week into it or we could be eleven months through it which would massively alter the seriousness of the scare mongering

    They also I noticed seem to skip past the quite possible reason for such a jump, oddly enough the exact same reason we have also over the last 10 years had massive curve breaking jumps in diseases like measles, mumps, small pox, chicken pox, Hepatitis B and C, Aids and HIV. Because immigrants are allowed to come here without any medical screening from countries with either no vaccination policies and no decent health care system and then show up on our figures as tho theres been some change in OUR practices

    But if you want to REALLY see some scary NHS proposals then swing a look at their plans to make HIV/AIDs tests compulsory for pregnant women, then look at the fact that all of the HIV tests are flawed and false positives run at about 50-60 % even on normal healthy people BUT shoot up to as high as 80-90% with pregnant women and pretty much anyone who has had a blood transfusion or taken any form of antibiotics

    And then cast a glance at the treatments they will, if found to test positive (which 80-90% of the time will be incorect) HAVE to take and see what the deformity and foetal mortality rates are when taking those treatments which again run at about 80-90% with some of them

    Infact one of the common drugs used for treatment is AZT, which was and still is banned from even being given to livestock, but for some strange and inexplicable reason is commonly given to diagnosed HIV or AIDs sufferers. but because of the type of drug it is has an almost total chance of negatively affecting the development of a foetus as it rearranges DNA and RNA base pair sequences which is about the worst thing that can happen to a growing developing baby as they are still being used to actually form its biomatter into a human being

    And yet both the US and the UK are planning to force the tests and treatment which could have massive and decimating outcomes for pregnant women if introduced

    and then you will have a real and actual travesty rather than a mere theorised and possibly exagerated one to worry about :)


    Being an ex nurse I can tell you they’ve been doing random HIV tests on pregnant women for atleast 13 years now .. whats scary about that is, they no some women have the HIV virus .. but they don’t know who it is and therefore have been unable to inform the affected women … usually these women were unaware of their status… how many more people have been infected because of this
    :?:

    Easy answer

    NONE

    Because its not even a virus and there isnt a single proven communicated case of aids OR HIV thats ever been recorded or proven :lol:

    #285419

    @ubermik wrote:

    @sweetass wrote:

    @ubermik wrote:

    Seriously tho, the article seems a bit vague really

    Firstly it doesnt say when this “year” they talk about starts and ends, we could be one week into it or we could be eleven months through it which would massively alter the seriousness of the scare mongering

    They also I noticed seem to skip past the quite possible reason for such a jump, oddly enough the exact same reason we have also over the last 10 years had massive curve breaking jumps in diseases like measles, mumps, small pox, chicken pox, Hepatitis B and C, Aids and HIV. Because immigrants are allowed to come here without any medical screening from countries with either no vaccination policies and no decent health care system and then show up on our figures as tho theres been some change in OUR practices

    But if you want to REALLY see some scary NHS proposals then swing a look at their plans to make HIV/AIDs tests compulsory for pregnant women, then look at the fact that all of the HIV tests are flawed and false positives run at about 50-60 % even on normal healthy people BUT shoot up to as high as 80-90% with pregnant women and pretty much anyone who has had a blood transfusion or taken any form of antibiotics

    And then cast a glance at the treatments they will, if found to test positive (which 80-90% of the time will be incorect) HAVE to take and see what the deformity and foetal mortality rates are when taking those treatments which again run at about 80-90% with some of them

    Infact one of the common drugs used for treatment is AZT, which was and still is banned from even being given to livestock, but for some strange and inexplicable reason is commonly given to diagnosed HIV or AIDs sufferers. but because of the type of drug it is has an almost total chance of negatively affecting the development of a foetus as it rearranges DNA and RNA base pair sequences which is about the worst thing that can happen to a growing developing baby as they are still being used to actually form its biomatter into a human being

    And yet both the US and the UK are planning to force the tests and treatment which could have massive and decimating outcomes for pregnant women if introduced

    and then you will have a real and actual travesty rather than a mere theorised and possibly exagerated one to worry about :)


    Being an ex nurse I can tell you they’ve been doing random HIV tests on pregnant women for atleast 13 years now .. whats scary about that is, they no some women have the HIV virus .. but they don’t know who it is and therefore have been unable to inform the affected women … usually these women were unaware of their status… how many more people have been infected because of this
    :?:

    Easy answer

    NONE

    Because its not even a virus and there isnt a single proven communicated case of aids OR HIV thats ever been recorded or proven :lol:

    Ere he is, Last Word Larry 8)

    #285420

    Am not

    :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

    #285421

    @ubermik wrote:

    Am not

    :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

    such an argumentative soul :roll:

    #285422

    @~Pebbles~ wrote:

    @ubermik wrote:

    Am not

    :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

    such an argumentative soul :roll:

    Oh no I’m not, so ner ner na ner ner :P :lol:

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 14 total)

Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!