-
Posts
-
Prison service leaders are being criticised amid claims they are relocating an office from Corby because the town is too white.
One of the factors behind the centre moving from Corby to Leicester, with the loss of 90 jobs, is because the city boasts a “diverse workforce”.
Other reasons given for relocation from Northants is more people in Leicester hold degrees than those in Corby.
Crown House has handled prison contracts for catering, transport and prisoner escorts for more than 30 years.
Almost 94% of the population in Corby are white British, compared with just under 60% in Leicester.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/northamptonshire/6406307.stm
The incredible decision, which could lead to an investigation by the Commission for Racial Equality, was disclosed yesterday in a leaked official letter.
It is the first known case of its kind, but MPs warned similar moves could secretly be taking place across the country as civil servants are under enormous pressure from ministers to boost the number of ethnic minorities working in the public sector.
In an astonishing reply, director of finance Ann Beasley – one of Home Secretary John Reid’s top civil servants – said the town had too many white British residents.
As a result, it does not satisfy the drive to recruit more ethnic minorities.
Mrs Beasley also implies Corby’s residents are also too stupid to keep the jobs, which are mostly clerical posts buying equipment for the prison service.
She states that 17 per cent of people living in Leicester are qualified to degree level, compared with only nine per cent in Corby.
Furious opposition politicians were stunned by the reply and accused Labour of effectively being racist against whites.
Louise Bagshawe, the candidate who received the letter, said: “Labour has controlled Corby council for 23 years and the town is very deprived. We have the lowest wages in Northamptonshire. Now locals are being told that Corby is too British for British jobs.”
She added: “I told Ann Beasley our town already has a thriving Polish immigrant community, but she ignored this. Corby is just beginning to turn the corner, but we need good jobs.
“Gordon Brown loves to bang on about Britishness – if he means it, I call on him to reverse this disgraceful policy and tell Corby people they aren’t too “white British” for Government jobs.”
The Home Office last night stood by the letter, saying that attracting a “more diverse workforce” was a “key factor” in moving the jobs.
But the Act does allow public bodies to take “positive action” to meet recruitment targets. In this instance, it would be illegal to say that the jobs must be filled by ethnic minority recruits, but moving to an area where they are more likely to apply for the posts is not illegal.
Staff based at the Crown House building in Corby will lose their jobs on March 19 when the building closes for regeneration work.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=439284&in_page_id=1770
No doubt JC poster genie buttface will be throwing a party for his liberal extremist pals at marxist New Labour, who continue to give a tax funded helping arm to minorities over the prodomanent indigenous white populations.
Who’s preparing themselves for the unbareable revolution?
Sometimes people wonder why i vote BNP…
Hardly surprising in a left wing apologist enviroment
If more non whites want to work there they should move there, if they cant be bothered to thats their problem
This kind of overt racism, because thats EXACTLY what it is should be classed and treated as such and the people responsible no matter how high a position they have should be sacked
We should be employing the people who are already live here and who were born here BEFORE creating unfair opportunitities for imported and often substandard foriegn imports
@ubermik wrote:
Hardly surprising in a left wing apologist enviroment
If more non whites want to work there they should move there, if they cant be bothered to thats their problem
This kind of overt racism, because thats EXACTLY what it is should be classed and treated as such and the people responsible no matter how high a position they have should be sacked
We should be employing the people who are already live here and who were born here BEFORE creating unfair opportunitities for imported and often substandard foriegn imports
Y’see this is the problem and this is why is doesnt get resolved.
I actually agree (god forbid) with Emma GENERAL statement. Moving a business to another area for a more “diverse” workforce doesn’t make sense and clearly is inappropriate and should be challenged (just as if the opposite were occurring)
HOWVER, when fools use statements like “employing people who already live here and who were born here” shows such a unintelligent view. The people who they will be employing in Leicester (as Emma will testify) WERE born here, DO live here and ARE English and with that I have no problem.
The decision to move out of Corby is wrong based on diversity but to make cheap political points about “being born here” (by which I assume you mean non white) simply plays into the hands of the barking left wing brigade who condone these decisions and allows them to carry on because you portray the counter argument is terms of “NO dogs, No Irish and No Blacks” terminology which is as outdated as it is foolish
Had the decision been made on economic grounds (i.e they couldnt recruit or sustain a managed workforce in Corby etc) then every business has the right to re locate.
IF I had meant WHITES who were born here I would have said just that, but I didnt did I? So why is that what you read? Too much PC brainwashing from birth? To oversensitive to the plight of poor ickle squeaky wheels? Why exactly?
Is reading and interpretting what is ACTUALLY written rather than what you would have liked to reply to really so difficult?
We already have more than enough indigenous people unemployed here that were born here, by slanting employment to people based on right rather than place of birth we create more jobs that will be filled by immigrants leaving the existing residents having to be supported on benefits
When people who are already here are employed THEN we need to start tainting employment to accomodate economic vagrants, and as they are unlikely to start moving businesses from predominantly asian areas as found around the country in places like leeds to a “whiter” area to maintain the exact same “balance” this action isnt really “equal” in any meaning of the word
The concept that every job, proffession, business, and levels within them should have some stupid dispersion pattern of ethnicity is not only racist, but it also ignores that different cultures like and dislike different types of jobs and aspects of jobs because the cultures are different and have different priorities and value systems, otherwise they would all be the same culture to begin with
That aside tho, we SHOULD have been equally trying to get the “standard” of peoples education in corby up that required as we would do were this same problem discovered in a predominently non white area
@slayer wrote:
I actually agree (god forbid) with Emma GENERAL statement. Moving a business to another area for a more “diverse” workforce doesn’t make sense and clearly is inappropriate and should be challenged (just as if the opposite were occurring)
And the BNP.
The people who they will be employing in Leicester (as Emma will testify) WERE born here, DO live here and ARE English and with that I have no problem.
Every single one will be born in England?
Had the decision been made on economic grounds (i.e they couldnt recruit or sustain a managed workforce in Corby etc) then every business has the right to re locate.
Thats the irony though slayer, Corby is a very poor town, the residents there thought they were just getting themselves on some sort of economic level playing field, what with the new shopping centre being built (yes, new one, because they have a “victorian” shopping centre), and now jobs because New Labour are anti-white racists and Corby is 93% white.
ubermik, to follow on from you, isnt it ironic when lefties point the finger at white people and call them chavs, no jobs, but another bunch of lefties take away their jobs.
Its social engineering, to bring everyone to the same level, easier to control us then.
To put this nightmare into perspective, had the jobs been taken away from asians in Leicester, and given to Corby, even for economic reasons, that would be classed as racist…
Well the other subtlety that slayer is conveniently choosing to overlook is that mindsets and policy implementations that favour none whites ARENT limited to just indigenous none whites are they?
Once in place and unquestioned they give the influx of economic migrants an advantage in gaining employment that the existing and predominantly white population dont have
IE its racist
Its also a complete but conveniently overlooked contradiction. On the one hand the tree hugging minority butt kissing left want us to appreciate and get orgasmic over every obscure culture in existence at the expense of our own
But whilst doing that they then conveniently ignore the fact that those same differences mean that each culture wont want to do each type of proffession in an equal and proportional amount to any other, infact its already known that some cultures dislike promotion and responsibility because they see a job merely as a means to an end and value their family and time with them far over proffessional achievemt or the ego boost of title
So on the one hand they whinge about the differences, but when it comes to employment they totally ignore them and expect every race and culture to be identical
This is no different to sexism in the work place, this was fought for, but have you noticed equal amounts of female sewerage workers? Builders? Road sweepers? Etc etc etc
Either people are different or they are the same, you cant have it both ways without looking stupid and self contradicting
I agree with you there ubermik.
Im starting to see and hear females saying, actually, thanks for giving me more of an equal right in the work place, that has given me the chance to further my career, but you were wrong to assume thats the way forward, i now miss my family and wana spend more time with them, bringing my children up, making dinner for my husband, being a housewife is what females are brest at.
The gimick of “blair’s babes” has lasted a long time, now we wait for brown and camerons blag for the floating voter, and in ten years, we’ll explain why it was wrong.
We really ought to have equality for women for things like emptying the dustbins and sweeping the streets. Why are hod carriers on building sites invariably male?
Nah, all women want to do is prance around the place fornicating at the drop of a fiver and breeding uncontrollably. Oh I almost forgot that they also love to moan and whinge endlessly about how unfair society is to them and how much they want to be treated equally in the workplace etc etc.
Yeah right!!!
@emmalush wrote:
I agree with you there ubermik.
Im starting to see and hear females saying, actually, thanks for giving me more of an equal right in the work place, that has given me the chance to further my career, but you were wrong to assume thats the way forward, i now miss my family and wana spend more time with them, bringing my children up, making dinner for my husband, being a housewife is what females are brest at.
The gimick of “blair’s babes” has lasted a long time, now we wait for brown and camerons blag for the floating voter, and in ten years, we’ll explain why it was wrong.
Emma, are you really taking us back 50 years- bringing up children, making dinner for hubby and being a housewife is what women are best at!!
OH, purlease!
Next you’ll be telling me they don’t have the intellect to vote
@ubermik wrote:
IF I had meant WHITES who were born here I would have said just that, but I didnt did I? So why is that what you read? Too much PC brainwashing from birth? To oversensitive to the plight of poor ickle squeaky wheels? Why exactly?
We already have more than enough indigenous people unemployed here that were born here, by slanting employment to people based on right rather than place of birth we create more jobs that will be filled by immigrants leaving the existing residents having to be supported on benefits
The move to Corby will give other British born citizens jobs but will be predominantly of a more diversely cultural back ground. From your statement above, you support the move to Leicester then.
And why do I read what I read- because I’ve seen, heard andf met too many people who cleverly hide their prejudices in rhetoric and divert attention from this by stating everyone else reads too much into it.
N please, I’m a tory of the Thatcher era not a left wing liberal- thanks
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!