Boards Index › General discussion › The locker room › TV replays
-
AuthorPosts
-
24 November, 2006 at 1:47 am #5635
Are you infavour of it?
It takes seconds to view an incident. Is it impossible for an incident to be viewed and decided before another incident occurs? Thus, the 4th official can alert the ref, the game is stopped and justice is done.
I would say a tv reply got Zinedine Zidane sent off, and if you look at that situation, the game had stopped via a foul, within seconds, a replay can be viewed, and a decision for say a red or yellow card, or indeed if a foul was commited or a player dived, could be delivered almost instantly.
Im infavour where its possible, when it doesn’t slow the game down too much, and lets face it, managers are always complaining that players play too much, so any rest is a good thing.
24 November, 2006 at 2:07 am #250693im for it and agaisnt it lol
im too tired to say my reasons so il say them tomorrow
24 November, 2006 at 2:21 am #25069424 November, 2006 at 1:32 pm #250695Would Mourinho sack drogba?
24 November, 2006 at 10:57 pm #250696@emmalush wrote:
Would Mourinho sack drogba?
Only if he could be sure he would stay on his feet for long enough to give him his cards lol!!
Its used in cricket all the time, dont see why we can at least not give it a trial or something, rather than the bigwigs just dismissing it all the time as a non starter. I also have doubts, but like anything, you dont know until you try
25 December, 2006 at 12:29 am #250697Ive noticed the media from all corners expressing opinion for tv replays, it seems from my media friends that fans are telling the football media that they realise it must be “atleast tried…the sooner the better”.
25 December, 2006 at 12:02 pm #250698THATS ALL WELL AND GOOD HAVING T V REPLAYS …….BUT THE VAST MAJORITY OF PRO FOOTBALL GAMES WILL NEVER HAVE A TV CAMERA POINTING THERE WAY.
26 December, 2006 at 1:22 pm #250699i think its all part and parcall of the game, bad calls.. ect ect… it what makes football football
26 December, 2006 at 10:30 pm #250700@matty wrote:
i think its all part and parcall of the game, bad calls.. ect ect… it what makes football football
Why do people think that professional football clubs, the fa/fifa and all that comes with them, is the game of football?????????????????
The above is business, they just USE the game of football to make money.
Whilst the business side of things is worth billions, its surely very important that its run as correctly as humans can get it.
For example, when a CUSTOMER pays £10 £15 £20 to watch a game of football at these business complexes they call stadiums, and the people who dictate the laws get a major decision wrong, and leaves the customer very unhappy, its not entertainment, its not really entertainment for the other sides customers, only if they laugh at you.
The least our modern technology society can do, is employ someone to make the customers happy when humanly possible.
You see it on sky now, when an incident occurs, it takes them 3-6 seconds to show the reply in slow-mo. A spare ref in the stand only has to signal to the ref (while the game is in process, or not), that what his initial decision was, is wrong. The goal, penalty or other decision can be put right, no one can moan, less agrevation for refs managers and players, and the game runs smoother.
I personally think smaller clubs would benefit more, because refs are scared of hate mail from bigger supported clubs.
27 December, 2006 at 4:46 pm #250701the smaller clubs would benifit from replays? they gonna have a chap with a cam corder on the goal line?
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!