Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › Oppressed posters
-
AuthorPosts
-
23 August, 2006 at 9:30 pm #5021
From the BNP website:
In the last few weeks the entire nature of the laws that regulate the internet have fundamentally changed. Though the Police have long had the power to prosecute people for their actions on the Internet they have in the past been unwilling to do so. This policy began to change last year when individuals were prosecuted and jailed for posting information on a website that was considered to be part of a campaign of racial harassment.
Since then two individuals have been charged with crimes related specifically to posting illegal information on the internet. Mr. Simon Sheppard has been charged with ten counts of “Incitement to Racial Hatred” and Mr. Luke O’Farrell with two counts even though the website of Mr. Sheppard is hosted in the United States. This means that those individuals who post information on forums, bulletin boards and websites hosted in the US, can now be prosecuted for incitement to racial hatred, incitement to violence and glorification of terrorism in the United Kingdom.
This law also covers those who wish to propagate and encourage political activities and actions that are based on following the methodology of those groups that used terror in the past as part of their political programmes.
Therefore those that seek to encourage people to follow the political methodology of political movements linked with violence and terrorism as defined by the CPS and the Attorney General, such as Islamic terrorism and Nazism, as part of a contemporary political programme, or who glorify or encourage such political methodology as part of a contemporary political programme, will now be under the scope of the law. It is not what ordinary people think, it is how the politically motivated operatives of the Labour government, the senior police chiefs, the CPS and the courts decide how the law should be applied.
No actions have to have taken place in order for the law to be triggered, all that needs to happen is that the words used can be seen as encouraging or glorification of violence such as against an ethnic group or religion. This includes the encouragement of people to follow political ideologies based on violence or that use violence as part of their political methodology.
In effect this law bans the promotion, glorification and encouragement of political ideologies that in the past have used violence, or applied violence, as part of their political programmes. It also applies to those political ideologies that have used violence as an integral part of its methodology or whose actual social and political manifestation would result in violence against groups in society. The nature of the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism are not defined and therefore include those that follow a political ideology with the intent that upon gaining power acts of terrorism directed against specific groups will follow.
Becarefull what you write from now on, if new labour dont agree with it, you could be punished.
23 August, 2006 at 10:25 pm #237383“WE” need to be careful? Don’t you mean “YOU”?
24 August, 2006 at 12:30 am #237384@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
“WE” need to be careful? Don’t you mean “YOU”?
No Mr bigastuff. You may describe the violence of what a political organisation did yonks ago, and that means you have broken the law. Even if its “considered” incitement to racial hatred (even if it isnt in your mind), then you can be prosecuted, even if this is posted through a foreign host.
terrorist • noun a person who uses violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.
New labour are terrorists through intimidation. Via this new law, you will be under the scope of the law for promoting new labour.
This whole internet law is a complete farce.
This poxy government is going to bring this country to its knees. They, people like blair etc, wont suffer, they’ll be flown first class to some beach with blue water. We’ll suffer, and have to pick up the peices, start from scratch, earn the right to go on holiday again, buy a car, own a house…
24 August, 2006 at 1:22 am #237385:shock: :-# :-# uh oh….
24 August, 2006 at 1:28 am #237386The law is evolving. New laws are coming into being to prevent Islamic fundamentalists from burning flags and demanding that people who offend Islam be killed.
The law applies to all.
25 August, 2006 at 2:20 pm #237387Emma you’re the one who needs to watch what they type. Inciting racial hatred is your favourite hobby along with promoting the activities of right-wing extremists. If it were up to me, I would have silenced you and your filthy, verminous, nazi bretheren a long time ago. You don’t care about what’s good for this country, all you care about is your disgusting extremist agenda. People like you want to cause unrest in this country just so you can see your bigoted plans realised. People like you were hoping for a backlash against innocent muslims in the wake of the terror threats, as it would suit your ends. As long as there are right-minded people in this country, we will continue to give you and your subversive, hate-ridden ideology the two-fingered salute. So stick that in your crack-pipe and smoke it.
25 August, 2006 at 2:33 pm #237388succinctly phrased Mr. Bigstuff….nice one! :D :D :D
25 August, 2006 at 3:45 pm #237389We are possibly in the ‘golden age’ of the internet at present. While its technological capability might continue to improve, its unregulated nature is likely to be curtailed. Also as the web matures, more and more free sites will become paysites.
Will websites about boxing or historic fighter aircraft become illegal as they glorify violence?
25 August, 2006 at 3:48 pm #237390Hope the Willie Thorne sites dont all become Paysites. [-o<
25 August, 2006 at 3:49 pm #237391I agree with ya though Bass. The internet at present is a wild frontier. Some form of regulation is inevitable.
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!