Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › We’ve Got Rebels
-
AuthorPosts
-
25 May, 2011 at 1:39 am #16274
Now we’ve got ‘Reb-elles’ . . . Are you a Reb-elle ?
WOMEN BECOMING OBSOLETE(left, Billboard for “French Connection” outside Eaton Center Toronto, with caption, “Who is Woman?”)
“There is no question that the Illuminati is bent on spreading dysfunction. Our political, business and cultural leaders are either fools or traitors, or both.”
By Henry Makow Ph.D
I spent last week in Toronto, where signs of the elite’s psychological attack on heterosexuals are everywhere. Young females are the main victims. (I will expand below.)
For example, on Saturday, the largest newspaper, The Toronto Star, featured a front-page story on a “progressive” couple which is raising their third child, “Storm” to be genderless. They are not telling the child or anyone else what sex s/he is.
Inside there are two full pages where this Marxist couple explains, “If you really want to get to know someone, you don’t ask what’s between their legs.”
“We’ve decided not to share Storm’s sex for now — a tribute to freedom of choice in place of limitation, a standup for what the world could become in Storm’s lifetime (a more progressive place.)”
Setting aside the absurd presumption that gender implies some limitation, why are these Marxist crackpots getting this kind of coverage? Why are they being set up as a model by the Illuminati-controlled media?
Look at the “parent central” logo where this article appears online. Dot in a circle, the familiar Illuminati motif.
In a sane world, child protective services would remove the child from these lunatics.
Masculinity and femininity are essential components of our identity. They are biologically determined not socially-conditioned. Males have ten times more testosterone than females.
There is no question that the Illuminati is bent on spreading dysfunction. Our political, business and cultural leaders are either fools or traitors, or both.
Here’s the full article.
Those Illuminateeeeez . . . Can’t trust anyone these days. :wink:
25 May, 2011 at 8:29 am #468760You still here thought you had flown the nest
or was that wishfall thinking :wink:25 May, 2011 at 9:19 am #468761@pickle wrote:
You still here thought you had flown the nest
or was that wishfall thinking :wink::shock: Pickle ! is that you ? :lol: ]
Someone has to look after the chicks.
Are you a Reb-elle ?
Just answer the question :wink:
25 May, 2011 at 9:44 am #468762From the same article:
If a woman will not accept her husband’s just leadership, she does not love him.
Femininity is based on loving and nurturing husband and children. A woman loves by surrendering power to her husband in exchange for his power (protection) expressed as love. Men want power; women want love. Heterosexual marriage is based on this exchange.
It just makes sense that a woman needs a man’s support while she raises children. Thus, marriage is essential to both a woman’s fulfillment and material security.
Masculinity is defined by power. Power = penis. Empower women and you give them a psychological penis. You neuter them.
By sabotaging their gender identity and their faith in marriage, the Illuminati are transforming females into their sexless worker-drones and amateur whores.
What a load of tripe! :lol:
25 May, 2011 at 9:59 am #468763yes it is i!!
25 May, 2011 at 10:21 am #468764@jen_jen wrote:
From the same article:
If a woman will not accept her husband’s just leadership, she does not love him.
Femininity is based on loving and nurturing husband and children. A woman loves by surrendering power to her husband in exchange for his power (protection) expressed as love. Men want power; women want love. Heterosexual marriage is based on this exchange.
It just makes sense that a woman needs a man’s support while she raises children. Thus, marriage is essential to both a woman’s fulfillment and material security.
Masculinity is defined by power. Power = penis. Empower women and you give them a psychological penis. You neuter them.
By sabotaging their gender identity and their faith in marriage, the Illuminati are transforming females into their sexless worker-drones and amateur whores.
What a load of tripe! :lol:
Ditto!!
25 May, 2011 at 10:43 am #468765Well we do have to take into account Henry’s ‘spiritual’ inclination toward this. :lol:
For example, on Saturday, the largest newspaper, The Toronto Star, featured a front-page story on a “progressive” couple which is raising their third child, “Storm” to be genderless. They are not telling the child or anyone else what sex s/he is.
Inside there are two full pages where this Marxist couple explains, “If you really want to get to know someone, you don’t ask what’s between their legs.”
“We’ve decided not to share Storm’s sex for now — a tribute to freedom of choice in place of limitation, a standup for what the world could become in Storm’s lifetime (a more progressive place.)”Storm in a D-Cup perhaps ?
:lol:Three lezzbo’s so far then . . . wooopz I mean feminists . . Well two and half, I think lol :wink:
25 May, 2011 at 10:46 am #468766@gazlan wrote:
Well we do have to take into account Henry’s ‘spiritual’ inclination toward this. :lol:
For example, on Saturday, the largest newspaper, The Toronto Star, featured a front-page story on a “progressive” couple which is raising their third child, “Storm” to be genderless. They are not telling the child or anyone else what sex s/he is.
Inside there are two full pages where this Marxist couple explains, “If you really want to get to know someone, you don’t ask what’s between their legs.”
“We’ve decided not to share Storm’s sex for now — a tribute to freedom of choice in place of limitation, a standup for what the world could become in Storm’s lifetime (a more progressive place.)”Storm in a D-Cup perhaps ?
:lol:Shame on you Gaz…….is that what you call women who reject your advances also……..Lesbo’s? :roll:
Three lezzbo’s so far then . . . wooopz I mean feminists . . Well two and half, I think lol :wink:
25 May, 2011 at 10:48 am #468767@kent f OBE wrote:
Shame on you Gaz…….is that what you call women who reject your advances also……..Lesbo’s? :roll:
Well I did say wooopz . . . :lol:
25 May, 2011 at 10:53 am #468768@gazlan wrote:
@kent f OBE wrote:
Shame on you Gaz…….is that what you call women who reject your advances also……..Lesbo’s? :roll:
Well I did say wooopz . . . :lol:
If you did a whoopsie (says in a Frank Spencer style) you could have deleted it you cheeky git :lol:
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!