Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › For Those Concerned
-
AuthorPosts
-
5 May, 2011 at 1:38 am #162247 May, 2011 at 10:41 am #467691
Sorry Gaz that this post is a bit late but i have only just seen it. Without having u having a go at me, may i ask who is Maud D’ib? i tried all of the links on your post but still dont know?
7 May, 2011 at 11:05 am #467692It’s Muad’Dib
7 May, 2011 at 4:24 pm #467693@eve wrote:
Sorry Gaz
There’s no need for that. This is Muad’Dib
It’s Muad’Dib
That’s education for ya. :lol:
7 May, 2011 at 4:34 pm #4676948 May, 2011 at 5:13 am #467695Thank u.
9 May, 2011 at 1:21 am #4676969 May, 2011 at 1:24 am #467697Just me again . . . . Checking my spelling :lol:
13 May, 2011 at 9:17 am #467698***Verdict: NOT Guilty***
Now there’s a result
8)
16 May, 2011 at 2:48 am #467699At last, we have a situation where a case brought against an innocent man has crumbled. Muad’Dib in his efforts to question the legality of the Governments account of the July 7 London bombings now coming to the attention of the ‘masses’.
In carrying out this absurd charge against Muad, the establishment have i believe shot themselves in the foot, long may it continue.May 14, 2011 — London, England
Now that Muad’Dib/John Hill has been found not guilty, the full story to this point of His malicious and politically motivated prosecution can be told…Three years ago, Muad’Dib mailed some DVDs containing his ‘7/7 Ripple Effect’ film to a courthouse near London, where three scapegoats were being prosecuted in hopes of lending credibility to the government’s “official” 7/7 story. These DVDs were sent by Muad’Dib because he wanted to keep innocent men from receiving very lengthy prison sentences. ALL the rest of us who knew about that situation should be ashamed for not having done exactly what Muad’Dib did.
As a result of his good-will, Muad’Dib’s home was raided by police and he was arrested on a charge of “perverting the course of justice”. In the Orwellian 21st century, he was really just being attacked by a malicious and out of control police-state for getting in the way of their mass-murderous crimes (7/7 was an event of mass-murder). The charge against Muad’Dib originated out of long-standing nazi-stronghold—London—where the globalist banking syndicate is headquartered.
So, Muad’Dib then spent over a year and a half fighting extradition to England where he knew it was going to be one corrupt event after another. The very short story is that his lawyer in Ireland refused to do as instructed and sabotaged his defense. Since the Irish judges were all quite corrupt too, never applying Law or even the relevant legislation, Muad’Dib’s fight against extradition was eventually denied by the Irish Supreme Court in front of 40 supporters and he was re-imprisoned, then taken to the UK in November of 2010.
Once there, the more obvious corruption started, as he was at that point held firmly in the clutches of a filthy corrupt British Establishment (including police, courts, and media).
Firstly, Muad’Dib was deleted from the prison’s computer system, with them originally saying that Muad’Dib wasn’t even at their prison and they didn’t know where he was. About that same time, a police officer working to prosecute Muad’Dib stated openly that many other people sent DVDs to the same courthouse as Muad’Dib, but no one else was even investigated, never-mind charged. This was an open admission of a malicious and politically motivated prosecution/persecution.
Eventually the prison system admitted they had Muad’Dib in custody, and a bail application was made, then denied, by a corrupt judge for the official reason that he “didn’t want more DVDs to be sent out”. Sending out DVDs is, of course, not actually a crime. Muad’Dib then spent approximately three months straight incarcerated, teaching and waking up a sizeable portion of the prison staff and inmates.
In early March of 2011, bail was finally granted by the only judge throughout this entire process that actually seemed like a reasonably honest man. However, this process was still made very difficult by the fact that the prison service kept making “mistakes” or “forgetting” to bring Muad’Dib to his own court hearings. In all, Muad’Dib was only produced for two of seven different court hearings whilst seeking bail.
more details can be read here
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!