Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › I don’t want to worry anyone but
-
AuthorPosts
-
4 June, 2010 at 11:36 am #14818
Ten dental X-rays ‘raise cancer risk
Dental X-rays given to millions of Britons every year may dramatically increase the risk of thyroid cancer, scientists warned last night.
Researchers found that patients who had been X-rayed by their dentist at least ten times were more likely to develop the disease.
They have now warned that X-rays should not be given at check-ups or when registering new patients – despite these practices being common in many dental surgeries.
Regular dental check-ups are important to maintain healthy gums and teeth, but scientists have found a link between dental x-rays and thyroid cancerWith rates of thyroid cancer more than doubling in 30 years, the scientists said that the potential dangers of dental X-rays were often overlooked.
Researcher Dr Anjum Memon, of Brighton and Sussex Medical School, said: ‘Our study highlights the concern that, like chest or other upper body Xrays, dental X-rays should be prescribed when the patient has a specific clinical need, and not as part of routine check-up or when registering with a dentist.’Dental leaders recommended that patients protect their thyroid – a hormone-releasing gland at the base of the neck – by wearing lightweight lead collars or bibs when being X-rayed.
The researchers asked 313 thyroid cancer patients and a similar number of healthy volunteers how many dental Xrays they had undergone.
After factoring in any hospital X-rays participants had had, they found that men and women who had had up to four dental X-rays were more than twice as likely to have developed the disease than those who had never had any.
Between five and nine X-rays and their risk rose more than four-fold, the journal Acta Oncologica reports.
In most danger were those who had had ten or more X-rays – their risk was 5.4 times that of someone who had never been X-rayed in the dentist’s chair.
The researchers relied on patients’ recollections, rather than dental records, but said that despite this, the finding was significant.
Dr Memon added that the results were supported by previous reports of increased risk of thyroid cancer in dentists, dental assistants and X-ray workers, suggesting that multiple low-dose exposures may be harmful.
Dr Memon, who carried out the research with experts from Cambridge and Kuwait universities, said: ‘It is important that our study is repeated with information from dental records including frequency of X-rays, age and dose at exposure.
‘If the results are confirmed, then the use of X-rays as a necessary part of evaluation for new patients, and routine periodic dental radiography, at six to 12 months interval, particularly for children and adolescents, will need to be reconsidered, as will a greater use of lead collar protection.’
But British dentists pointed out that the study was carried out in Kuwait, where rates of thyroid cancer are much higher than in the UK, and said the researchers did not know what sort of X-ray equipment had been used.
Dr Nigel Carter, chief executive of the British Dental Health Foundation, said: ‘The number of X-rays being taken in dental practice in the UK has greatly reduced in recent years and the dosages from modern equipment are extremely low.
‘Current recommendations would also be that a thyroid shield is always used to protect the patient against any spread of radiation. Dental X-rays have a valuable role in the diagnosis of dental disease.’
4 June, 2010 at 11:44 am #441559The article below appeared in The Australian Newspaper, April 29, 1997. It speaks for itself.
Cell phones/cancer connection, by Stewart Fist, The Australian newspaper, Tues 29 April 1997
A team of scientists funded by Telstra to investigate claimed links between cellular phones and cancer has turned up probably the most significant finding of an adverse health effects yet.
When presented to ‘Science’ magazine for publication the study was rejected on the grounds that publication “would cause a panic”. Three other prominent magazines including ‘Nature’ also later rejected the report, suggesting that they would not handle such important conclusions without the research being further confirmed
Its Koitains for the lot of us i tell ya !
4 June, 2010 at 12:02 pm #441560Try http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/healthyliving/cancercontroversies/mobilephones/ – a little more up-to date :wink:
Re the x-rays, how ironic that radiation used to take an x-ray is now linked with cancer, and then they use high doses of radiation in radiotherapy to kill cancer. Of course what they don’t tell you as you undergo the radiotherapy treatment is that whilst it may well kill your current cancer, it can then cause another form of cancer further down the line that cannot be treated by chemotherapy or radiotherapy.
Bloody awful indiscriminate disease :twisted:
4 June, 2010 at 1:36 pm #441561@jen_jen wrote:
Try http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/healthyliving/cancercontroversies/mobilephones/ – a little more up-to date :wink:
Re the x-rays, how ironic that radiation used to take an x-ray is now linked with cancer, and then they use high doses of radiation in radiotherapy to kill cancer. Of course what they don’t tell you as you undergo the radiotherapy treatment is that whilst it may well kill your current cancer, it can then cause another form of cancer further down the line that cannot be treated by chemotherapy or radiotherapy.
Bloody awful indiscriminate disease :twisted:
Just where did the time go ….tut ! :shock:
I think i saw somewhere on the interweb about a drug used to aid relief to sufferers of arythmia….the major side effect was irratic heartbeat..lol
One thing is for sure, the Cancer buisiness is boomin… I have seen some interesting things on the ” dr rath foundation ” website, i think the site puts focus on corporate suppression of natural medicines etc… :o
4 June, 2010 at 2:30 pm #441562Now I am pro-complementary therapies, but even in the complementary therapy world Dr Rath is seen as a dangerous quack! :lol:
4 June, 2010 at 2:47 pm #441563So was Dr Kelly..look what happened to him lol :o :lol:
4 June, 2010 at 2:52 pm #441564I don’t think Dr Kelly suggested people with cancer turn their back on conventional medicine and follow his nutrient programme, promising that they’d be cured. :wink:
4 June, 2010 at 2:59 pm #441565If only Dr kelly had been given the chance to be heard ….All those lives could have been saved ….maybe ! I need to look closer at Dr Rath and find out ” whats his racket “….
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!