-
Posts
-
Is it that this monster who has the audacity to call herself a mother, going to serve only a total of 5 years!! if she’s given 15 years, then she should serve 15 years, no time off for good behaviour no leniency no nothing!! Show her the same, if not worse, kind of cruelty she showed to those children, innocent victims of her and her boyfriends sick sense of fun!!!
How much help are those children getting, not as much as her and her scumbag b/f will be i’ll bet.
Evil evil evil, I hope they both rot in hell, I hope that she takes such a beating in prison that she never able again to produce any offspring!
Jesus it makes me so mad that scum like that are allowed to roam the earth!!! :twisted:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2010/03/13/angela-gordon-cruel-mum-who-killed-her-skeletal-daughter-khyra-ishaq-may-be-freed-from-prison-in-just-five-years-115875-22107309/Sentenced to 15 years. Our wonderful Government has decreed that all prisoners are elegible for release after having served only HALF of their sentence…… no matter how terrible their crimes are. Thus her actual time of incarceration is only 7 1/2 years.
Well you know whose policies created this horror folks – just remember this when you come to cast your vote in the General Election – coming your way soon.
I completly agree with you Cas. All this time off for good behaviour and being eligible for parole after serving half their time is all wrong. For ALL crimes, and especially ones like this, there shouldn’t be any parole or time off for good behaviour.
Prisoners should be made to serve their entire sentence with no chance of parole. And yes PB, I know whose useless policies created this horror, and I can assure you, Mr Brown and his useless spineless joke of a government will NOT be getting my vote.
these policys have bin around for 30 odd years , through every goverment weve had , and shud tories get in they wont change it, oh it has changed slightly it used to be half sentence or 1/3 witty woo
They dont have to let them out at all
:shock: She wants to go to parenting classes and apply for full custody of the other children she abused when she` s released.
I`m sorry, but someone who could do this shouldn`t even be still alive :evil:
@nemesis wrote:
:shock: She wants to go to parenting classes and apply for full custody of the other children she abused when she` s released.
I`m sorry, but someone who could do this shouldn`t even be still alive :evil:
Strange isn’t it, how they all suddenly want to be model parents when it’s too late.Wouldn’t be a case her her brief telling her to say all this to make herself look good would it, a reformed character, never would she harm a child again. No she wouldn’t, not if I had my way, not only would she never see her other children again, she’d never bear another child again, i’d make sure of it!!! :twisted:
I’m not being funny but “good behaviour”….erm surely there isn’t much bad behaviour you could get upto in prison?…And what is classed as bad behaviour? Do the public know? I bet their policies on bad behaviour don’t match what the majority of the public think is bad behaviour.
@kent f OBE wrote:
I bet their policies on bad behaviour don’t match what the majority of the public think is bad behaviour.
….. but then the majority of the public aren’t convicted criminals serving time in prison.
@forumhostpb wrote:
@kent f OBE wrote:
I bet their policies on bad behaviour don’t match what the majority of the public think is bad behaviour.
….. but then the majority of the public aren’t convicted criminals serving time in prison.
No but they are law abiding citizens who know right from wrong good from bad…good behaviour from bad behaviour…I bet you dealing in drugs is not classed as bad behaviour in prison but it sure is out of prison…….maybe someone whos been inside the nick would like to enlighten us
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!