-
Posts
-
Jon Venables ‘returned to Liverpool for drug-fuelled nights out’
Jon Venables returned to the city where he murdered the toddler James Bulger for drug-fuelled nights out, according to reports.
The 27-year-old allegedly drank cider and snorted cocaine in several of Liverpool’s popular nightclubs, despite licence conditions banning him from returning to the city without permission from his parole officer.
He is also said to have slipped into Goodison Park stadium to watch Everton matches wearing a team shirt.
Venables and Robert Thompson abducted Bulger from the New Strand shopping centre in Bootle, Merseyside, in February 1993, when they were both 10.
They bludgeoned the toddler to death on a railway line close to their homes in Walton, and became the youngest people to be convicted of murder and jailed in English criminal history.
The pair were given new identities and released from custody in 2001, but Venables is now back in prison after breaching the terms of their parole.
He has reportedly become a regular user of ecstasy and cocaine in the eight years since his initial release, and has allegedly become prone to violent outbursts of temper.
The killer has frequented clubs and bars in Liverpool including Krazy House, The Funky Box, Bar Fly and Walkabout, sources have told The Daily Mirror.
Cloaked under his new identity, he regularly drank eight pints of Strongbow cider as well as Cheeky Vimtos – a potent combination of the alcopop WKD and two shots of port – it has been claimed.
Venables also allegedly took ecstasy and snorted cocaine and kitty – also known as methadrone or MCAT – on his nights out in the city.
Sources said he often left his friends to wander the streets of Liverpool at night – waiting alone at the station for the first train home in the morning.
But they insisted he had never returned to Bootle – the district of Liverpool where he and Thompson abducted Bulger from a crowded shopping centre.
The 27-year-old is said to have attempted to flirt with women in bars and nightclubs, but to have difficulty forming long term relationships.
Calls are growing for the reason for his recall to be disclosed, amid reports that his fellow prisoners have already worked out his true identity.
Venables is being kept under constant observation in isolation for his own protection, according to The Sun.
Governors at the prison where he is being held, which cannot be reported for legal reasons, have confirmed his status to staff as “high risk” and refused to deny his identity, it has been reported.
reformed my arse
indeed Pete……proves to me the point I made some time back about little shits who are out of control so young and then being institutionalised during teenage years!! How on earth can they become reformed! Both of them should have stayed in prison alot longer.
He already has a new identity Will…and probably has no job either….
Somthing ive wondered is about when you fill in forms and they ask for all previous names etc…do people like Venebles have to disclose their previous names? I doubt it…so you break the law with the most dispicable crime get a new name new home benefits…don’t have to disclose your past so its basically wiped out except for certain authorities to know…which by the way have obviously failed us all again because the crime he comited now is a sexual crime!
And they say crime doesn’t pay :roll:@will wrote:
so basicalley we are all goin to work to pay tax to get a child murderer a new identity… fckin typical of this country.
Good stuff will. So you’ll be emigrating shortly then eh?
Oh and BTW – where will you go ???
I hear Afgfhanistan is very warm this time of yr
I watched James Bulgers mum on the ‘This Morning’ programme today.
Who would want to be in that womans shoes, not one of us. She rightly said that both of these lads have been treated like some kind of stars, millions of pounts have been spent on them.
For what? for at least one of them to stick his fingers up at the law and think he’s invincible and way above it, because thats what he’s been led to believe by the way he’s been treated. Well at least now he is back in prison, an adult prison, where he belongs, and I for one hope that he remains there for a very very long time :evil:
@will wrote:
@forumhostpb wrote:
@will wrote:
so basicalley we are all goin to work to pay tax to get a child murderer a new identity… fckin typical of this country.
Good stuff will. So you’ll be emigrating shortly then eh?
Oh and BTW – where will you go ???
eh? where did this cum from.
stay on topic man!
It is on topic will
Reverting to Venables and Jamie Bulger’s mother….. in line with ‘will’s’ request…….
The thing I simply don’t understand is why she is (apparently) so desperate to know what offence (or offences) Venables allegedly committed before being recalled to prison.
Indeed I wonder why the Media have worked themselves up into a frenzy over the same thing.
What does it matter what crime he has allegedly committed? He is now in prison and has had his parole revoked. If he is subsequently tried and convicted, then he will be further punished.
I do have a slight suspicion that Mrs ‘Bulger’ (or whatever her surname is now) has something of a hidden agenda in her hysterical demands for ‘the truth’. Could it be that she is the (paid?) spokeswoman for the Media???
Might it possibly be that as soon as Jack Straw (the Justice Secretary) tells he in strict confidence what the alleged crime was, she hotfoots it to the Media with her hand out for a nice little payoff????
I wouldn’t like to believe thats for one second PB. Although I probably think that since Venebles name has been back in the media she has probably been hounded for her opinions, and the media have probably said to her you have the right to demand to know whats going on with Venebles, and she probably believes it. However surely she won’t be told anything in confidence and if she was would she be made to sign a confidentiality agreement ? Doubt she would sign it, so no exchange of information.
Even if the crime he commited was similar to what he did to James (which I think we all know its not), he will still be protected, he will still be released from Jail in some years to come. Telling the justice system that “we told you so, he should never have been released” will make no difference.I agree with your point that Mrs Whatever-her-new-name-is is most probably being manipulated by the Media and encouraged to add her voice to the growing howls of outrage.
But I still don’t get it. Maybe I’m missing the point somewhere.
Let’s assume, for the sake of the argument, that Venables has committed some heinous crime. Bestiality with a neighbour’s cat; loitering with intent to use a pedestrian crossing; or whatever.
Does it REALLY make any difference to anything at all if we, the public, are told exactly what the crime is???
Surely the central point is that he is now safely behind bars again, comfortably esconced in his centrally heated cell; having his three square meals a day; and coupled with unlimited oppportunities for consenting sex with any number of other similarly minded male prisoners.
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!