Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › Labour Bingo
-
AuthorPosts
-
21 September, 2009 at 4:44 am #13658
Just when you thought Labour had stopped digging that big hole for themselves, they took delivery of an industrial earth mover.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6841326.ece
MINISTERS are considering making motorists legally responsible for accidents involving cyclists or pedestrians, even if they are not at fault.
Government advisers are pushing for changes in the civil law that will make the most powerful vehicle involved in a collision automatically liable for insurance and compensation purposes.
And for why? The environment, of course. Good grief.
Again, one must wonder at the sanity of Labour policy-makers. And again, there can be only two possible explanations.
- 1) Labour simply don’t ever want to be elected again. And while I would applaud their selfless political suicide for the good of the country if that were the case, it’s a bit difficult to imagine that such control freaks and power mad, dictatorial tax spongers are that community conscious, so it only leaves us with …
2) Labour are so mired in fake charities; self-appointed, state-paid moral guardians; personal-enrichment obsessed quangoistas; personal politics motivated civil servants, and single issue fruitcakes, that they believe – and I mean truly believe – that the millions who are turned off or enraged at their lunatic ideas are unrepresentative of the population.
Either that, or they have invested all the Labour Party membership fees in ‘no win, no fee’ solicitor stocks.
So motorists join small businessmen, large businessmen, householders, smokers, drinkers, chocolate-lovers, teens, the elderly, parent volunteers, home schoolers, and Daniel Hannan, on Labour’s bingo card of people to denormalise and mark out for government spite.
I think they can call ‘House’ now.
21 September, 2009 at 5:00 am #416121the most powerful vehicle!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :twisted:
“my cc is bigger than your cc”” ner ner ner :?
21 September, 2009 at 6:36 am #416122You’ve got a CC ? :shock: :lol:
21 September, 2009 at 7:47 am #416123me frikking car has lol :lol:
21 September, 2009 at 7:55 am #416124I’ll be breaking the 125cc out of storage then 8)
21 September, 2009 at 8:48 am #416125This “new” policy, imposed on us by the cycling Nazis, is a perfect opportunity for the motorist (who pay taxes for the privilege) to mow down militant cyclists (who DON’T pay taxes for the privilege).
The next time one of these lycra clad fascists zooms up the inside lane illegally, swiftly jerk your steering wheel to your left and bump them off their infernal machines into the gutter … where they belong!
21 September, 2009 at 5:38 pm #416126Pushbike for sale….open to offers :roll:
21 September, 2009 at 7:57 pm #416127Wouldn’t it just make more sense to make insurance for cyclists mandatory (or at least have a public insurance premium worked into the purchase price of a bike)?
21 September, 2009 at 8:46 pm #416128that would be too simple 8)
21 September, 2009 at 9:35 pm #416129Excellent idea Martin – except that the lycra clad fascists would immediately start moaning that they were being unfairly discriminated against.
Anyway some stupid bugger would want to start “learning lessons” again and set up a whole new Governemt department (at our cost) to do so.
The fact is that bicyclists are a menace on the roads – to pedestrians and drivers alike. we should treat them like grey squirrels – declare them to be vermin and put a bounty on their heads.
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!