-
Posts
-
Jill Dando’s killer is released after a retrial. He’d served eight years in prison for the murder.
The police are “disappointed” by the verdict but “respect” the court’s decision.
:roll: will they bother trying to find the real killer or can’t they be arsed?
Maybe miscarriages of justice work both ways?
Maybe the police know what happened (not everything can be presented in court)
Who knows but normally when this occurs and the police use these words it means they believe he really did do it and there is no benefit in reopening the file
@slayer wrote:
Maybe the police know what happened (not everything can be presented in court)
:-s huh?
My own thoughts on this matter is how could he be found guilty by one jury and innocent by another??
It really doesn’t say much for our judicial system does it? :roll:@sir Actor wrote:
@slayer wrote:
Maybe the police know what happened (not everything can be presented in court)
:-s huh?
My own thoughts on this matter is how could he be found guilty by one jury and innocent by another??
It really doesn’t say much for our judicial system does it? :roll:and thats why im against capital punishment !
@rubyred wrote:
@sir Actor wrote:
@slayer wrote:
Maybe the police know what happened (not everything can be presented in court)
:-s huh?
My own thoughts on this matter is how could he be found guilty by one jury and innocent by another??
It really doesn’t say much for our judicial system does it? :roll:and thats why im against capital punishment !
me too rubes. unless it was Tony Blair on trial.
@sir Actor wrote:
@rubyred wrote:
@sir Actor wrote:
@slayer wrote:
Maybe the police know what happened (not everything can be presented in court)
:-s huh?
My own thoughts on this matter is how could he be found guilty by one jury and innocent by another??
It really doesn’t say much for our judicial system does it? :roll:and thats why im against capital punishment !
me too rubes. unless it was Tony Blair on trial.
cant stand him myself buddy ! oh dear but thats a story for a night with a whisky in hands :)
this has set the Labour party back years and years. So many promises. So many Lies.Grrrrr !
@rubyred wrote:
@sir Actor wrote:
@rubyred wrote:
@sir Actor wrote:
@slayer wrote:
Maybe the police know what happened (not everything can be presented in court)
:-s huh?
My own thoughts on this matter is how could he be found guilty by one jury and innocent by another??
It really doesn’t say much for our judicial system does it? :roll:and thats why im against capital punishment !
me too rubes. unless it was Tony Blair on trial.
cant stand him myself buddy ! oh dear but thats a story for a night with a whisky in hands :)
this has set the Labour party back years and years. So many promises. So many Lies.Grrrrr !
I heard Alan Sugar saying how good a PM Gordon Brown is.
Sir Alan has obviously lost the plot.Hes doing quite well under this lot to the tune of £800 million he was behind me in his new Black Rolls-Royce Phantom AMS 1 reg. If your interested you can buy his old one for £179,500.
Might have two at that price :lol:
What got me was, 8 years ago the press went mental at trying to convince the public that he killed Jill Dando, now they are up in arms about the “serious” miscarriage of justice this century has ever seen :roll:
Like someone said, how can one jury find him guilty and another find him not?I think it might be because they were presented with a different set of evidence.
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!