po.rnography

I remember looking at that collection of “artistic” photos Madonna did.

It was suprisingly heavy to hold with one hand, and I’m still banned from that book shop.

We had a midfield player at the arsenal called johnny jensen once. Looked like one of them german moustachioed 70s po/rn stud muffins on a grainy b+w film that none of us ever watched for a laff when younger when we weren’t out with the lads on a drunken night.

Absolute Highbury legend because he couldn’t get a direct hit on a cows ar/se with a ten foot banjo if he tried. He used to collect the ball in defence and the crowd would go…… “Shoot ! “…….

Great day it was when he finally scored, and then we sold him lol

I agree Poli, there is nothing unatural about what happens between a man and a woman, and a traffic cone.

Intelligence, humour and a nice set of babylons are a turn-on. Furthermore, there are also women who can have these qualities.

Pornography takes many forms and cath25(and a bit) recently posted a good example on this site.

Is it still demeaning if the toilet don’t flush ?

@~Pebbles~ wrote:

a lad at work showed me a clip from a po.rn film that someone had sent to his phone. It was of a woman being taken from behind while at the same time the man held her head down a toilet and flushed it – if thats not demeaning, i dont know what is! :o :P

Maybe she wanted to be demeaned …. or she’d really p issed him off lol but as i said its her choice to be filmed and allow these things to happen, it’s only wrong when its forced or against someones will, it’s not for others to decide what a women finds demeaning or does not or wether she enjoys being demeaned or not its personal choice. Whats a turn on for one may be boring for another, as what may be incredibly erotic for one is sick and demeaning to another and there is so many different levels of po.rn, and thats obviously along the more weird fetish type level.